Image MIME Reference
CMU-Raster
CMU Window Manager Raster
image/x-cmu-raster
VS
Digital Camera Raw (Generic Linux MIME)
image/x-dcraw
Generic-RAW
A complete technical comparison of CMU Window Manager Raster and Digital Camera Raw (Generic Linux MIME) — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | CMU-Raster | Generic-RAW |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | ✕ No | Yes |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | Yes |
| ICC Color Profile | ✕ No | Yes |
CMU Window Manager Raster
image/x-cmu-raster
Extension
.ras
Container
CMU Window Manager Bitmap
Compression
Uncompressed
Algorithm
None
Color Depth
1-bit (Monochrome), 8-bit (Indexed/Grayscale)
Developed by
Carnegie Mellon University (CMU)
Released
1980s
Magic Bytes
F1 00 40 BB
Digital Camera Raw (Generic Linux MIME)
image/x-dcraw
Extension
.raw
Container
Varies (Predominantly TIFF/EP)
Compression
Lossless / Uncompressed
Algorithm
Varies (Often Lossless JPEG ITU-T81 or uncompressed)
Color Depth
12-bit, 14-bit, 16-bit
Developed by
freedesktop.org (MIME mapping) / Dave Coffin (dcraw tool)
Released
1997
Magic Bytes
Varies by vendor format
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | CMU-Raster | Generic-RAW |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
CMU-Raster
CMU-Raster Strengths
- Incredibly simple, uncompressed binary structure that was easy for early, memory-constrained UNIX workstations to parse and render
Limitations
- Completely obsolete and unsupported outside of niche historical command-line tools like Netpbm
- The shared '.ras' file extension causes frequent file misidentification and system conflicts
- Lacks all modern imaging features, including metadata, compression, and alpha channel transparency
Generic-RAW
Generic-RAW Strengths
- Provides a unified, highly useful catch-all MIME type for application developers who just need to know if a file is a raw image, rather than tracking 50+ individual camera extensions
- Deeply integrated into the Linux desktop ecosystem, ensuring file manager thumbnails work seamlessly via tools like ufraw-thumbnailer
Limitations
- Not an official IANA standard
- Can cause conflicts where standard TIFF files are misidentified as raw camera data by over-aggressive MIME sniffers
- The underlying 'dcraw' tool was abandoned by its creator in 2018 (though its successor, LibRaw, continues to maintain the ecosystem)
When to choose which format
CMU-Raster
Use CMU-Raster when…
- Historical UNIX / Andrew Project Archival
- Legacy Academic Computing Research
Generic-RAW
Use Generic-RAW when…
- Linux Desktop File Associations (GNOME/KDE)
- Thumbnail Generation for Raw Images (UFRaw/LibRaw)
- Server-side Image Processing Fallbacks