Image MIME Reference
CMU-Raster
CMU Window Manager Raster
image/x-cmu-raster
VS
BlockFact Image
image/vnd.blockfact.facti
FACTI
A complete technical comparison of CMU Window Manager Raster and BlockFact Image — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | CMU-Raster | FACTI |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | ✕ No | Yes |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | ✕ No | Yes |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | Yes |
| ICC Color Profile | ✕ No | Yes |
CMU Window Manager Raster
image/x-cmu-raster
Extension
.ras
Container
CMU Window Manager Bitmap
Compression
Uncompressed
Algorithm
None
Color Depth
1-bit (Monochrome), 8-bit (Indexed/Grayscale)
Developed by
Carnegie Mellon University (CMU)
Released
1980s
Magic Bytes
F1 00 40 BB
BlockFact Image
image/vnd.blockfact.facti
Extension
.facti
Container
BlockFact Authenticated Container
Compression
Container (Inherits payload compression, e.g., JPEG/PNG)
Algorithm
None (Pass-through to embedded payload)
Color Depth
Inherited from payload
Developed by
BlockFact
Released
2025
Magic Bytes
Unknown (Proprietary Container)
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | CMU-Raster | FACTI |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
CMU-Raster
CMU-Raster Strengths
- Incredibly simple, uncompressed binary structure that was easy for early, memory-constrained UNIX workstations to parse and render
Limitations
- Completely obsolete and unsupported outside of niche historical command-line tools like Netpbm
- The shared '.ras' file extension causes frequent file misidentification and system conflicts
- Lacks all modern imaging features, including metadata, compression, and alpha channel transparency
FACTI
FACTI Strengths
- Provides undeniable, mathematically verifiable proof of a photo's origin (time, location, and device) via the StarkNet blockchain [1.3.1]
- Privacy-first design utilizes zero-knowledge proofs (Groth16), meaning the actual image is never uploaded to a central server or blockchain
- Invisible watermarking ensures that even if the image is screenshotted or cropped, tampering can be detected
Limitations
- Lacks native rendering support in web browsers and standard image viewers, requiring specialized software to view
- Requires blockchain registration at the moment of capture, making it incompatible with existing legacy photos
- The proprietary nature of the container limits integration to environments supporting the BlockFact SDK
When to choose which format
CMU-Raster
Use CMU-Raster when…
- Historical UNIX / Andrew Project Archival
- Legacy Academic Computing Research
FACTI
Use FACTI when…
- Journalism and Media Authentication
- Legal and Insurance Evidence
- AI Deepfake Prevention
- Content Provenance and Authorship