Image MIME Reference
CMU-Raster
CMU Window Manager Raster
image/x-cmu-raster
VS
Epson Raw Format
image/x-epson-erf
Epson-ERF
A complete technical comparison of CMU Window Manager Raster and Epson Raw Format — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | CMU-Raster | Epson-ERF |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | ✕ No | Yes |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | Yes |
| ICC Color Profile | ✕ No | ✕ No |
CMU Window Manager Raster
image/x-cmu-raster
Extension
.ras
Container
CMU Window Manager Bitmap
Compression
Uncompressed
Algorithm
None
Color Depth
1-bit (Monochrome), 8-bit (Indexed/Grayscale)
Developed by
Carnegie Mellon University (CMU)
Released
1980s
Magic Bytes
F1 00 40 BB
Epson Raw Format
image/x-epson-erf
Extension
.erf
Container
TIFF/EP
Compression
Uncompressed / Lossless JPEG (ITU-T81)
Algorithm
NoneLossless JPEG
Color Depth
12-bit (Per Channel)
Developed by
Seiko Epson Corporation
Released
2004
Magic Bytes
49 49 2A 00 or 4D 4D 00 2A
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | CMU-Raster | Epson-ERF |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
CMU-Raster
CMU-Raster Strengths
- Incredibly simple, uncompressed binary structure that was easy for early, memory-constrained UNIX workstations to parse and render
Limitations
- Completely obsolete and unsupported outside of niche historical command-line tools like Netpbm
- The shared '.ras' file extension causes frequent file misidentification and system conflicts
- Lacks all modern imaging features, including metadata, compression, and alpha channel transparency
Epson-ERF
Epson-ERF Strengths
- Preserves original raw sensor data, allowing extreme recovery of highlights and shadows compared to in-camera JPEGs
- Utilizes the standard TIFF container structure, making it relatively easy for open-source software (like dcraw and LibRaw) to parse and decode
Limitations
- Completely obsolete proprietary format tied to a defunct line of digital cameras
- Requires parsing EXIF metadata to differentiate it from standard TIFF files programmatically
- Cannot be natively viewed in web browsers or standard operating system image viewers without specialized codecs
When to choose which format
CMU-Raster
Use CMU-Raster when…
- Historical UNIX / Andrew Project Archival
- Legacy Academic Computing Research
Epson-ERF
Use Epson-ERF when…
- Vintage Digital Photography (Epson R-D1)
- Non-destructive Image Post-Processing
- Raw Imaging Archival