Free webp to jpg
Image MIME Reference
CMU-Raster

CMU Window Manager Raster

image/x-cmu-raster
VS

Fuji Xerox EDMICS-MMR

image/vnd.fujixerox.edmics-mmr
EDMICS-MMR

A complete technical comparison of CMU Window Manager Raster and Fuji Xerox EDMICS-MMR — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature CMU-Raster EDMICS-MMR
Transparency (Alpha) ✕ No ✕ No
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No ✕ No
HDR Support ✕ No ✕ No
EXIF Metadata ✕ No ✕ No
ICC Color Profile ✕ No ✕ No
CMU Window Manager Raster
image/x-cmu-raster
Extension
.ras
Container CMU Window Manager Bitmap
Compression Uncompressed
Algorithm
None
Color Depth 1-bit (Monochrome), 8-bit (Indexed/Grayscale)
Developed by Carnegie Mellon University (CMU)
Released 1980s
Magic Bytes
F1 00 40 BB
Full CMU-Raster reference →
Fuji Xerox EDMICS-MMR
image/vnd.fujixerox.edmics-mmr
Extension
.mmr.edm
Container Fuji Xerox EDMICS Wrapper
Compression Modified Modified READ (MMR / Group 4 Fax)
Algorithm
MMR (ITU-T T.6 / CCITT Group 4)
Color Depth 1-bit (Monochrome / Bi-level)
Developed by Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd.
Released 1990s
Magic Bytes
Unknown (Proprietary Container wrapped around MMR bitstream)
Full EDMICS-MMR reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser CMU-Raster EDMICS-MMR
Chrome Chrome
Firefox Firefox
Safari Safari
Edge Edge
IE IE (Legacy)
CMU-Raster

CMU-Raster Strengths

  • Incredibly simple, uncompressed binary structure that was easy for early, memory-constrained UNIX workstations to parse and render
Limitations
  • Completely obsolete and unsupported outside of niche historical command-line tools like Netpbm
  • The shared '.ras' file extension causes frequent file misidentification and system conflicts
  • Lacks all modern imaging features, including metadata, compression, and alpha channel transparency
EDMICS-MMR

EDMICS-MMR Strengths

  • Utilized the highly efficient MMR (Group 4) algorithm, which allowed massive, E-size engineering blueprints to be compressed into tiny file sizes suitable for 1990s hard drives and networks
  • Deeply integrated into Fuji Xerox hardware and database systems for seamless scan-to-archive workflows
Limitations
  • Completely proprietary and closed-source, making modern archival extraction and migration extremely difficult
  • No support in modern image processing libraries like ImageMagick, libvips, or standard TIFF viewers without first stripping the proprietary header
  • Strictly limited to 1-bit monochrome images

When to choose which format

CMU-Raster
Use CMU-Raster when…
  • Historical UNIX / Andrew Project Archival
  • Legacy Academic Computing Research
EDMICS-MMR
Use EDMICS-MMR when…
  • Fuji Xerox EDMICS Enterprise Systems
  • Archival of Large-Format Engineering Drawings
  • Legacy Corporate Document Scanning Pipelines
Share this comparison