Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
CMU-Raster

CMU Window Manager Raster

image/x-cmu-raster
VS

DirectDraw Surface

image/vnd.ms-dds
DDS

A complete technical comparison of CMU Window Manager Raster and DirectDraw Surface — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature CMU-Raster DDS
Transparency (Alpha) ✕ No Yes
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No ✕ No
HDR Support ✕ No Yes
EXIF Metadata ✕ No ✕ No
ICC Color Profile ✕ No ✕ No
CMU Window Manager Raster
image/x-cmu-raster
Extension
.ras
Container CMU Window Manager Bitmap
Compression Uncompressed
Algorithm
None
Color Depth 1-bit (Monochrome), 8-bit (Indexed/Grayscale)
Developed by Carnegie Mellon University (CMU)
Released 1980s
Magic Bytes
F1 00 40 BB
Full CMU-Raster reference →
DirectDraw Surface
image/vnd.ms-dds
Extension
.dds
Container DirectDraw Surface
Compression Block Compression (BC1-BC7) / DXTC / S3TC / Uncompressed (RGBA, Floating-Point)
Algorithm
DXT1-DXT5BC1-BC7ASTC / ETC2 (Extended)
Color Depth 8-bit, 16-bit, 24-bit, 32-bit (RGBA), 16-bit/32-bit Floating Point (HDR)
Developed by Microsoft Corporation
Released 1999
Magic Bytes
44 44 53 20
Full DDS reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser CMU-Raster DDS
Chrome Chrome
✕ ✕
Firefox Firefox
✕ ✕
Safari Safari
✕ ✕
Edge Edge
✕ ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✕ ✕
CMU-Raster

CMU-Raster Strengths

  • Incredibly simple, uncompressed binary structure that was easy for early, memory-constrained UNIX workstations to parse and render
Limitations
  • Completely obsolete and unsupported outside of niche historical command-line tools like Netpbm
  • The shared '.ras' file extension causes frequent file misidentification and system conflicts
  • Lacks all modern imaging features, including metadata, compression, and alpha channel transparency
DDS

DDS Strengths

  • Massively reduces VRAM footprint and memory bandwidth usage because the GPU decodes the block compression in hardware
  • Encapsulates complex texture arrays, volume textures, cubemaps, and entire mipmap chains within a single, highly structured file
  • Supports high-dynamic-range (HDR) floating-point data for modern physically based rendering (PBR)
Limitations
  • Block compression algorithms (like DXT) are lossy and can introduce ugly blocky artifacts, especially in smooth gradients or normal maps if not tuned properly
  • Files are generally larger on the physical hard drive than highly compressed formats like PNG or WebP
  • Zero support in web browsers or standard consumer image viewers

When to choose which format

CMU-Raster
Use CMU-Raster when…
  • Historical UNIX / Andrew Project Archival
  • Legacy Academic Computing Research
DDS
Use DDS when…
  • Real-Time 3D Game Textures
  • DirectX and Vulkan Rendering Pipelines
  • Skyboxes and Environment Cubemaps
  • Volume Textures (3D Textures)

More comparisons

CMU-Raster vs ACES → DDS vs ACES → CMU-Raster vs APNG → DDS vs APNG → CMU-Raster vs AVCI → DDS vs AVCI → CMU-Raster vs AVCS → DDS vs AVCS → CMU-Raster vs AVIF → DDS vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison