Image MIME Reference
Canon-CRW
Canon Raw Format
image/x-canon-crw
VS
CMU Window Manager Raster
image/x-cmu-raster
CMU-Raster
A complete technical comparison of Canon Raw Format and CMU Window Manager Raster — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | Canon-CRW | CMU-Raster |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | Yes | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | Yes | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | ✕ No | ✕ No |
Canon Raw Format
image/x-canon-crw
Extension
.crw
Container
CIFF (Camera Image File Format)
Compression
Lossless JPEG (ITU-T81)
Algorithm
Lossless JPEG
Color Depth
10-bit (Per Channel), 12-bit (Per Channel)
Developed by
Canon Inc.
Released
1998
Magic Bytes
49 49 1A 00 00 00 (Header) / 48 45 41 50 43 43 44 52 (HEAPCCDR signature near end)
CMU Window Manager Raster
image/x-cmu-raster
Extension
.ras
Container
CMU Window Manager Bitmap
Compression
Uncompressed
Algorithm
None
Color Depth
1-bit (Monochrome), 8-bit (Indexed/Grayscale)
Developed by
Carnegie Mellon University (CMU)
Released
1980s
Magic Bytes
F1 00 40 BB
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | Canon-CRW | CMU-Raster |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
Canon-CRW
Canon-CRW Strengths
- Preserves original raw sensor data from foundational early digital SLR cameras, allowing for modern noise reduction and demosaicing algorithms to extract better images than software could in 2003
- Files are remarkably small (often 6-8 MB) compared to modern 40MB+ raw files due to the lower megapixel count of early sensors
Limitations
- Completely obsolete and utilizes the idiosyncratic CIFF structure rather than the modern, standardized TIFF/EP structure
- Cannot be natively viewed in web browsers or standard operating system image viewers without specialized codecs
- Less robust metadata support compared to modern CR2 or CR3 formats
CMU-Raster
CMU-Raster Strengths
- Incredibly simple, uncompressed binary structure that was easy for early, memory-constrained UNIX workstations to parse and render
Limitations
- Completely obsolete and unsupported outside of niche historical command-line tools like Netpbm
- The shared '.ras' file extension causes frequent file misidentification and system conflicts
- Lacks all modern imaging features, including metadata, compression, and alpha channel transparency
When to choose which format
Canon-CRW
Use Canon-CRW when…
- Historical Digital Photography (2000-2004)
- Non-destructive Image Post-Processing
- Raw Imaging Archival
CMU-Raster
Use CMU-Raster when…
- Historical UNIX / Andrew Project Archival
- Legacy Academic Computing Research