Free webp to jpg
Image MIME Reference
Canon-CR2

Canon Raw Version 2

image/x-canon-cr2
VS

CMU Window Manager Raster

image/x-cmu-raster
CMU-Raster

A complete technical comparison of Canon Raw Version 2 and CMU Window Manager Raster — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature Canon-CR2 CMU-Raster
Transparency (Alpha) ✕ No ✕ No
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No ✕ No
HDR Support Yes ✕ No
EXIF Metadata Yes ✕ No
ICC Color Profile Yes ✕ No
Canon Raw Version 2
image/x-canon-cr2
Extension
.cr2
Container TIFF
Compression Lossless JPEG (ITU-T81)
Algorithm
Lossless JPEG (ITU-T81)
Color Depth 12-bit (Per Channel), 14-bit (Per Channel)
Developed by Canon Inc.
Released 2004
Magic Bytes
49 49 2A 00 10 00 00 00 43 52 02 00
Full Canon-CR2 reference →
CMU Window Manager Raster
image/x-cmu-raster
Extension
.ras
Container CMU Window Manager Bitmap
Compression Uncompressed
Algorithm
None
Color Depth 1-bit (Monochrome), 8-bit (Indexed/Grayscale)
Developed by Carnegie Mellon University (CMU)
Released 1980s
Magic Bytes
F1 00 40 BB
Full CMU-Raster reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser Canon-CR2 CMU-Raster
Chrome Chrome
Firefox Firefox
Safari Safari
Edge Edge
IE IE (Legacy)
Canon-CR2

Canon-CR2 Strengths

  • Retains maximum sensor data, allowing extreme recovery of highlights and shadows that would be permanently lost in a JPEG
  • White balance and color profiling are not 'baked in', meaning they can be completely altered in post-production without degrading the image
  • Lossless compression ensures perfect pixel accuracy while reducing file size compared to fully uncompressed formats
Limitations
  • Proprietary format means it requires constant updates to raw processing engines (like Adobe Camera Raw) every time Canon releases a new camera model
  • Produces very large file sizes (often 20MB to 40MB per image depending on sensor resolution)
  • Cannot be directly embedded into web pages or used in standard HTML/CSS contexts
CMU-Raster

CMU-Raster Strengths

  • Incredibly simple, uncompressed binary structure that was easy for early, memory-constrained UNIX workstations to parse and render
Limitations
  • Completely obsolete and unsupported outside of niche historical command-line tools like Netpbm
  • The shared '.ras' file extension causes frequent file misidentification and system conflicts
  • Lacks all modern imaging features, including metadata, compression, and alpha channel transparency

When to choose which format

Canon-CR2
Use Canon-CR2 when…
  • Professional Digital Photography
  • Non-destructive Image Post-Processing
  • High Dynamic Range (HDR) Imaging Archival
CMU-Raster
Use CMU-Raster when…
  • Historical UNIX / Andrew Project Archival
  • Legacy Academic Computing Research
Share this comparison