Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
BTIF

Bank Telecommunications Image Format

image/prs.btif
VS

Digital Entertainment Content Ecosystem (DECE) Graphic

image/vnd.dece.graphic
DECE-Graphic

A complete technical comparison of Bank Telecommunications Image Format and Digital Entertainment Content Ecosystem (DECE) Graphic — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature BTIF DECE-Graphic
Transparency (Alpha) ✕ No Yes
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No ✕ No
HDR Support ✕ No ✕ No
EXIF Metadata ✕ No ✕ No
ICC Color Profile ✕ No ✕ No
Bank Telecommunications Image Format
image/prs.btif
Extension
.btif.btf
Container Proprietary Check Image Container
Compression Lossy (JPEG-based) / Lossless (TIFF-based)
Algorithm
JPEGTIFF-variant
Color Depth 1-bit (B&W), 8-bit (Grayscale)
Developed by NationsBank (Bank of America) / Ben Simon
Released 1998
Magic Bytes
Unknown (Proprietary container)
Full BTIF reference →
Digital Entertainment Content Ecosystem (DECE) Graphic
image/vnd.dece.graphic
Extension
.jpg.png.uvi
Container Standard JPEG/PNG within DECE CFF structures
Compression Lossy (JPEG) / Lossless (PNG)
Algorithm
DCT (JPEG)DEFLATE (PNG)
Color Depth 8-bit (RGB), 24-bit (RGB)
Developed by Digital Entertainment Content Ecosystem (DECE) LLC
Released 2011
Magic Bytes
FF D8 FF (If JPEG) / 89 50 4E 47 (If PNG)
Full DECE-Graphic reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser BTIF DECE-Graphic
Chrome Chrome
✕ ✕
Firefox Firefox
✕ ✕
Safari Safari
✕ ✕
Edge Edge
✕ ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✕ ✕
BTIF

BTIF Strengths

  • Allowed early digital archiving and web-based transmission of cleared bank checks
  • Encapsulated both image data and ASCII transaction metadata in a single file
Limitations
  • Completely proprietary and obsolete format
  • Lacks native support in modern operating systems and image viewers
  • Requires legacy plugins or specialized bio-format readers (like ImageC) to decode
DECE-Graphic

DECE-Graphic Strengths

  • Allowed the UltraViolet DRM ecosystem to easily distinguish structural UI/cover graphic assets from actual encrypted video tracks in a Common File Format container
Limitations
  • Completely obsolete since the 2019 shutdown of UltraViolet
  • Unnecessary abstraction, as the underlying files were just standard JPEGs or PNGs
  • Causes modern strict MIME-type validators to fail if they rely on the Content-Type header

When to choose which format

BTIF
Use BTIF when…
  • Bank Check Archiving (Legacy)
  • Financial Transaction Records
DECE-Graphic
Use DECE-Graphic when…
  • UltraViolet Movie Cover Art
  • Common File Format (CFF) Asset Manifests
  • Legacy DRM Ecosystems

More comparisons

BTIF vs ACES → DECE-Graphic vs ACES → BTIF vs APNG → DECE-Graphic vs APNG → BTIF vs AVCI → DECE-Graphic vs AVCI → BTIF vs AVCS → DECE-Graphic vs AVCS → BTIF vs AVIF → DECE-Graphic vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison