Image MIME Reference
AZV
AirZip Accelerator Image
image/vnd.airzip.accelerator.azv
VS
DICOM Run-Length Encoding
image/dicom-rle
DICOM-RLE
A complete technical comparison of AirZip Accelerator Image and DICOM Run-Length Encoding — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | AZV | DICOM-RLE |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | Yes |
| Progressive Loading | Yes | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | ✕ No | Yes |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | ✕ No | Yes |
AirZip Accelerator Image
image/vnd.airzip.accelerator.azv
Extension
.azv
Container
Proprietary AirZip Container
Compression
Lossy (Proprietary) / Lossless (Proprietary)
Algorithm
AirZip Proprietary Compression
Color Depth
8-bit (Indexed), 24-bit (RGB)
Developed by
AirZip, Inc.
Released
1999
Magic Bytes
Unknown (Proprietary)
DICOM Run-Length Encoding
image/dicom-rle
Extension
.dcm.dicom
Container
DICOM (PS3.10)
Compression
Lossless (RLE)
Algorithm
Run-Length Encoding (RLE)
Color Depth
8-bit, 16-bit, 24-bit
Developed by
National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) / ACR
Released
1993
Magic Bytes
44 49 43 4D (at byte offset 128)
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | AZV | DICOM-RLE |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
AZV
AZV Strengths
- Historically allowed internet users to browse the web up to 5x faster over 56k dial-up modems by drastically reducing image payload sizes
- Officially registered in the IANA vendor tree, preventing MIME type conflicts on early web proxy servers
Limitations
- Completely obsolete in the modern broadband era
- Closed-source and proprietary, meaning no modern image manipulation libraries (like ImageMagick or libvips) can decode it
- Zero support in standard web browsers
DICOM-RLE
DICOM-RLE Strengths
- Guarantees lossless preservation of critical medical data necessary for diagnostics
- Extremely robust metadata structure containing patient information, modality, and spatial geometry
- Faster to encode and decode than complex compression schemes like JPEG 2000
Limitations
- RLE compression offers very low compression ratios compared to modern codecs like JPEG-LS or JPEG 2000
- Zero support in web browsers or standard consumer image viewers
- Strict data privacy regulations (HIPAA/GDPR) make handling DICOM files complex due to embedded PHI
When to choose which format
AZV
Use AZV when…
- Dial-up Web Acceleration
- Bandwidth Optimization (Historical)
- Legacy Proxy Servers
DICOM-RLE
Use DICOM-RLE when…
- Medical Imaging
- Ultrasound
- X-Rays / CT / MRI
- PACS Archives