Image MIME Reference
AVCI
AVC Image (HEIF Container)
image/avci
VS
CMU Window Manager Raster
image/x-cmu-raster
CMU-Raster
A complete technical comparison of AVC Image (HEIF Container) and CMU Window Manager Raster — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | AVCI | CMU-Raster |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | Yes | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | Yes | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | Yes | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | Yes | ✕ No |
AVC Image (HEIF Container)
image/avci
Extension
.avci.hif
Container
HEIF / ISOBMFF (ISO/IEC 14496-12)
Compression
Lossy / Lossless
Algorithm
AVC (Advanced Video Coding / H.264)
Color Depth
8-bit, 10-bit, 12-bit
Developed by
Moving Picture Experts Group (MPEG) / ISO/IEC JTC 1
Released
2015
Magic Bytes
XX XX XX XX 66 74 79 70 61 76 63 69
CMU Window Manager Raster
image/x-cmu-raster
Extension
.ras
Container
CMU Window Manager Bitmap
Compression
Uncompressed
Algorithm
None
Color Depth
1-bit (Monochrome), 8-bit (Indexed/Grayscale)
Developed by
Carnegie Mellon University (CMU)
Released
1980s
Magic Bytes
F1 00 40 BB
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | AVCI | CMU-Raster |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
AVCI
AVCI Strengths
- Shares the robust, flexible HEIF container architecture that allows for rich metadata, HDR, and depth maps.
- Backed by the highly ubiquitous AVC (H.264) codec, which is widely supported in hardware decoding.
- Supports rectangular cropping and rotation metadata without needing to re-encode the pixel data.
Limitations
- No native support within web browsers for HTML rendering.
- Inferior compression efficiency when compared to newer container formats like HEIC (HEVC) or AVIF (AV1).
- Easily confused with HEIC and AVIF, which use the same base ISOBMFF container.
CMU-Raster
CMU-Raster Strengths
- Incredibly simple, uncompressed binary structure that was easy for early, memory-constrained UNIX workstations to parse and render
Limitations
- Completely obsolete and unsupported outside of niche historical command-line tools like Netpbm
- The shared '.ras' file extension causes frequent file misidentification and system conflicts
- Lacks all modern imaging features, including metadata, compression, and alpha channel transparency
When to choose which format
AVCI
Use AVCI when…
- Digital Photography
- Camera Capture
- Archival Storage
CMU-Raster
Use CMU-Raster when…
- Historical UNIX / Andrew Project Archival
- Legacy Academic Computing Research