Free webp to jpg
Image MIME Reference
Alias-PIX

Alias PIX Image

image/x-alias-pix
VS

JPEG 2000 Compound Image File Format

image/jpm
JPM

A complete technical comparison of Alias PIX Image and JPEG 2000 Compound Image File Format — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature Alias-PIX JPM
Transparency (Alpha) ✕ No Yes
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No Yes
HDR Support ✕ No ✕ No
EXIF Metadata ✕ No Yes
ICC Color Profile ✕ No Yes
Alias PIX Image
image/x-alias-pix
Extension
.pix.als.alias.img
Container Alias PIX Header
Compression Run-Length Encoding (RLE)
Algorithm
RLE
Color Depth 24-bit (RGB), 8-bit (Matte/Grayscale variant)
Developed by Alias Research (Later Alias|Wavefront / Autodesk)
Released Early 1990s
Magic Bytes
No explicit magic bytes (Relies on 10-byte integer header)
Full Alias-PIX reference →
JPEG 2000 Compound Image File Format
image/jpm
Extension
.jpm.jpgm
Container ISOBMFF / JPM (ISO/IEC 15444-6)
Compression Lossy / Lossless / Mixed Raster Content (MRC)
Algorithm
JPEG 2000JBIG2JPEGMMR
Color Depth 1-bit (Text/Masks), 8-bit, 16-bit, 24-bit
Developed by Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG)
Released 2003
Magic Bytes
00 00 00 0C 6A 50 20 20 0D 0A 87 0A ... 66 74 79 70 6A 70 6D 20
Full JPM reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser Alias-PIX JPM
Chrome Chrome
Firefox Firefox
Safari Safari
Edge Edge
IE IE (Legacy)
Alias-PIX

Alias-PIX Strengths

  • The highly simplified structure made it incredibly fast to encode and decode on early 1990s SGI hardware
  • Lossless Run-Length Encoding (RLE) saved disk space without degrading the quality of final 3D renders
Limitations
  • Completely obsolete, having been replaced by more robust formats like TIFF, TGA, and EXR in modern 3D pipelines
  • The lack of a distinct magic byte signature makes reliable automated file detection almost impossible
  • Does not support integrated alpha channels, instead requiring cumbersome, separate 'Matte' files to denote transparency
JPM

JPM Strengths

  • Highly optimized for scanned documents, drastically reducing file sizes without sacrificing the readability of text or the quality of embedded photos
  • Supports multi-page documents within a single file
  • Object-based architecture allows for complex layout representation and independent extraction of elements
Limitations
  • Failed to achieve widespread adoption, largely being overshadowed by PDF/A and DjVu
  • Zero native web browser compatibility
  • Requires complex, specialized software to properly encode and decode the multi-layered MRC structure

When to choose which format

Alias-PIX
Use Alias-PIX when…
  • Legacy Alias PowerAnimator Textures
  • 1990s SGI Workstation Render Outputs
  • Historical 3D Graphics Archival
JPM
Use JPM when…
  • Scanned Document Archiving
  • Mixed Raster Content (MRC) Imaging
  • Digital Libraries
Share this comparison