Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
TIFF

Tagged Image File Format (Legacy MIME)

image/x-tiff
VS

Windows Metafile

image/x-wmf
WMF

A complete technical comparison of Tagged Image File Format (Legacy MIME) and Windows Metafile — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature TIFF WMF
Transparency (Alpha) Yes Yes
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No ✕ No
HDR Support Yes ✕ No
EXIF Metadata Yes ✕ No
ICC Color Profile Yes ✕ No
Tagged Image File Format (Legacy MIME)
image/x-tiff
Extension
.tiff.tif
Container IFD (Image File Directory) Tag Structure
Compression Uncompressed / LZW (Lossless) / ZIP / Deflate (Lossless) / PackBits (Lossless RLE) / JPEG (Lossy) / CCITT Group 3/4 (Fax/Document)
Algorithm
NoneLZWDeflatePackBitsJPEGCCITT
Color Depth 1-bit (Monochrome), 8-bit (Grayscale or Indexed), 16-bit (Per Channel), 32-bit (Float Per Channel)
Developed by Aldus Corporation (Later acquired by Adobe Systems)
Released 1986
Magic Bytes
49 49 2A 00 (Little-endian) or 4D 4D 00 2A (Big-endian)
Full TIFF reference →
Windows Metafile
image/x-wmf
Extension
.wmf.emf
Container Windows GDI Metafile Command Stream
Compression Uncompressed (Command Stream)
Algorithm
None
Color Depth Varies based on GDI rendering engine
Developed by Microsoft Corporation
Released 1990
Magic Bytes
D7 CD C6 9A (Aldus Placeable Metafile Header) or 01 00 09 00 (Standard WMF Header)
Full WMF reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser TIFF WMF
Chrome Chrome
✕ ✕
Firefox Firefox
✕ ✕
Safari Safari
✕ ✕
Edge Edge
✕ ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✕
✓
TIFF

TIFF Strengths

  • Universally accepted as the gold standard for high-fidelity archival and professional print workflows
  • Highly adaptable structure supports multiple pages (documents), layers, vast bit depths, and diverse compression algorithms within a single file
  • Unmatched support for rich metadata including EXIF, IPTC, XMP, and custom ICC color profiles
Limitations
  • Produces exceptionally large file sizes compared to modern web formats
  • The 'x-tiff' legacy MIME string forces developers to write extra validation logic to prevent strict security filters from rejecting valid uploads
  • The format's immense complexity means that many lightweight parsers only implement a subset of the specification, sometimes failing to read obscure compressions (like CCITT or old JPEG-in-TIFF)
WMF

WMF Strengths

  • Infinitely scalable vector format that remains remarkably compact for simple geometric illustrations and charts
  • Historically served as a seamless conduit for copying and pasting vector graphics between disparate Windows applications via the system clipboard
Limitations
  • Notoriously plagued by historic security vulnerabilities, making raw WMF parsing a vector for exploits in legacy software
  • Completely obsolete and unsupported in modern web environments (browsers cannot render them)
  • Strictly tied to the Windows GDI architecture, making cross-platform rendering inconsistent across Linux and macOS

When to choose which format

TIFF
Use TIFF when…
  • Professional Print and Desktop Publishing
  • High-Resolution Archival Scanning
  • Master Copies of Digital Photography
WMF
Use WMF when…
  • Legacy Microsoft Office Clip Art and Icons
  • Windows GDI Graphics Export
  • Early Windows Desktop Publishing

More comparisons

TIFF vs ACES → WMF vs ACES → TIFF vs APNG → WMF vs APNG → TIFF vs AVCI → WMF vs AVCI → TIFF vs AVCS → WMF vs AVCS → TIFF vs AVIF → WMF vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison