Image MIME Reference
SGI
Silicon Graphics Image
image/sgi
VS
TIFF for Facsimile eXtended
image/tiff-fx
TIFF-FX
A complete technical comparison of Silicon Graphics Image and TIFF for Facsimile eXtended — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | SGI | TIFF-FX |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | Yes | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | ✕ No | Yes |
Silicon Graphics Image
image/sgi
Extension
.sgi.rgb.rgba.bw.int.inta
Container
SGI Image Format
Compression
Uncompressed / Lossless (Run-Length Encoding)
Algorithm
RLENone
Color Depth
8-bit, 16-bit (Per Channel)
Developed by
Paul Haeberli (Silicon Graphics)
Released
1990
Magic Bytes
01 DA
TIFF for Facsimile eXtended
image/tiff-fx
Extension
.tiff.tif
Container
TIFF 6.0 Tag Directory Structure
Compression
MH / MR / MMR (CCITT Group 3 & 4) / JBIG / JPEG
Algorithm
CCITT Group 3/4JBIGJPEG
Color Depth
1-bit (Monochrome B&W), 8-bit (Grayscale/Color Indexed), 24-bit (RGB Color)
Developed by
IETF (Internet Engineering Task Force)
Released
1998
Magic Bytes
49 49 2A 00 (Little-Endian) / 4D 4D 00 2A (Big-Endian)
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | SGI | TIFF-FX |
|---|---|---|
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
SGI
SGI Strengths
- Pioneered multi-channel and 16-bit per channel imaging capabilities required for high-end 1990s visual effects
- Extremely robust and simple header structure
- Reliable Run-Length Encoding provided solid lossless compression for flat-shaded 3D renders
Limitations
- Completely obsolete for modern web and application development
- Zero native web browser compatibility
- Largely replaced by TIFF and OpenEXR in modern professional VFX and 3D pipelines
TIFF-FX
TIFF-FX Strengths
- Provides a universal, standardized format for transmitting multi-page documents over IP networks and email (Internet Fax)
- Supports highly efficient telecom-centric compression algorithms (MMR, JBIG) that produce very small files for text documents
- Maintains backwards compatibility with standard TIFF parsers
Limitations
- Not supported natively by web browsers
- Requires complex parsing of TIFF IFD tags to differentiate a true TIFF-FX file from a standard TIFF file
- Usage is slowly declining as traditional faxing is replaced by secure PDF transmission and e-signature platforms
When to choose which format
SGI
Use SGI when…
- Legacy 3D Animation & VFX
- Silicon Graphics IRIX Workflows
- Historical CGI Archiving
TIFF-FX
Use TIFF-FX when…
- Internet Fax (T.37)
- Enterprise Fax Servers
- Document Archiving
- Telecommunications