Image MIME Reference
SGI-RGB
Silicon Graphics Image
image/x-rgb
VS
Tagged Image File Format (Legacy MIME)
image/x-tiff
TIFF
A complete technical comparison of Silicon Graphics Image and Tagged Image File Format (Legacy MIME) — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | SGI-RGB | TIFF |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | Yes | Yes |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | ✕ No | Yes |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | Yes |
| ICC Color Profile | ✕ No | Yes |
Silicon Graphics Image
image/x-rgb
Extension
.rgb.sgi.rgba.bw.int.inta
Container
SGI Image Header (512 bytes)
Compression
Uncompressed / Run-Length Encoding (RLE)
Algorithm
NoneScanline RLE
Color Depth
8-bit (Per Channel), 16-bit (Per Channel)
Developed by
Silicon Graphics, Inc. (Paul Haeberli)
Released
1988
Magic Bytes
01 DA
Tagged Image File Format (Legacy MIME)
image/x-tiff
Extension
.tiff.tif
Container
IFD (Image File Directory) Tag Structure
Compression
Uncompressed / LZW (Lossless) / ZIP / Deflate (Lossless) / PackBits (Lossless RLE) / JPEG (Lossy) / CCITT Group 3/4 (Fax/Document)
Algorithm
NoneLZWDeflatePackBitsJPEGCCITT
Color Depth
1-bit (Monochrome), 8-bit (Grayscale or Indexed), 16-bit (Per Channel), 32-bit (Float Per Channel)
Developed by
Aldus Corporation (Later acquired by Adobe Systems)
Released
1986
Magic Bytes
49 49 2A 00 (Little-endian) or 4D 4D 00 2A (Big-endian)
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | SGI-RGB | TIFF |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
SGI-RGB
SGI-RGB Strengths
- Supports 16-bit precision per channel and an embedded alpha channel, making it ideal for the demanding compositing workflows of 1990s cinema VFX
- The scanline-based RLE compression was exceptionally fast to decode on classic MIPS-based SGI workstations
- Features a straightforward 512-byte header, making it relatively easy to parse and write custom decoders in C or Python
Limitations
- Completely obsolete and unsupported in modern web environments
- Replaced entirely by TIFF, OpenEXR, and PNG in modern visual effects and 3D rendering pipelines
- Lacks support for modern color management via ICC profiles or advanced EXIF metadata
TIFF
TIFF Strengths
- Universally accepted as the gold standard for high-fidelity archival and professional print workflows
- Highly adaptable structure supports multiple pages (documents), layers, vast bit depths, and diverse compression algorithms within a single file
- Unmatched support for rich metadata including EXIF, IPTC, XMP, and custom ICC color profiles
Limitations
- Produces exceptionally large file sizes compared to modern web formats
- The 'x-tiff' legacy MIME string forces developers to write extra validation logic to prevent strict security filters from rejecting valid uploads
- The format's immense complexity means that many lightweight parsers only implement a subset of the specification, sometimes failing to read obscure compressions (like CCITT or old JPEG-in-TIFF)
When to choose which format
SGI-RGB
Use SGI-RGB when…
- Legacy 3D Animation and VFX Textures
- Silicon Graphics IRIX Workstation Archival
- 1990s Medical Imaging
TIFF
Use TIFF when…
- Professional Print and Desktop Publishing
- High-Resolution Archival Scanning
- Master Copies of Digital Photography