Image MIME Reference
PTI
PTI Image (Personal/Vanity Tree)
image/prs.pti
VS
Windows Metafile
image/x-wmf
WMF
A complete technical comparison of PTI Image (Personal/Vanity Tree) and Windows Metafile — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | PTI | WMF |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | ✕ No | Yes |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | ✕ No | ✕ No |
PTI Image (Personal/Vanity Tree)
image/prs.pti
Extension
.pti
Container
Proprietary
Compression
Unknown / Proprietary
Algorithm
Unknown
Color Depth
Unknown
Developed by
Jürn Laun
Released
1999
Magic Bytes
Unknown
Windows Metafile
image/x-wmf
Extension
.wmf.emf
Container
Windows GDI Metafile Command Stream
Compression
Uncompressed (Command Stream)
Algorithm
None
Color Depth
Varies based on GDI rendering engine
Developed by
Microsoft Corporation
Released
1990
Magic Bytes
D7 CD C6 9A (Aldus Placeable Metafile Header) or 01 00 09 00 (Standard WMF Header)
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | PTI | WMF |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ |
✓
|
PTI
PTI Strengths
- Provided a registered MIME type namespace for a specific application's proprietary image format without conflicting with standard web types
Limitations
- Completely undocumented and unsupported in modern ecosystems
- Zero web browser compatibility
- Falls into the 'vanity' tree, making it irrelevant for standard cross-platform data exchange
WMF
WMF Strengths
- Infinitely scalable vector format that remains remarkably compact for simple geometric illustrations and charts
- Historically served as a seamless conduit for copying and pasting vector graphics between disparate Windows applications via the system clipboard
Limitations
- Notoriously plagued by historic security vulnerabilities, making raw WMF parsing a vector for exploits in legacy software
- Completely obsolete and unsupported in modern web environments (browsers cannot render them)
- Strictly tied to the Windows GDI architecture, making cross-platform rendering inconsistent across Linux and macOS
When to choose which format
PTI
Use PTI when…
- Legacy Application Specific Workflows
- Proprietary Image Storage
WMF
Use WMF when…
- Legacy Microsoft Office Clip Art and Icons
- Windows GDI Graphics Export
- Early Windows Desktop Publishing