Image MIME Reference
PTI
PTI Image (Personal/Vanity Tree)
image/prs.pti
VS
T.38 Fax over IP (FoIP)
image/t38
T.38
A complete technical comparison of PTI Image (Personal/Vanity Tree) and T.38 Fax over IP (FoIP) — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | PTI | T.38 |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | ✕ No | ✕ No |
PTI Image (Personal/Vanity Tree)
image/prs.pti
Extension
.pti
Container
Proprietary
Compression
Unknown / Proprietary
Algorithm
Unknown
Color Depth
Unknown
Developed by
Jürn Laun
Released
1999
Magic Bytes
Unknown
T.38 Fax over IP (FoIP)
image/t38
Extension
.t38
Container
UDPTL or TCP (Network Transport)
Compression
Lossless (MH, MR, MMR / T.4, T.6)
Algorithm
MH (Modified Huffman)MR (Modified Read)MMR (Modified Modified Read)
Color Depth
1-bit (Monochrome B&W)
Developed by
ITU-T (International Telecommunication Union)
Released
1998
Magic Bytes
None (Network Stream)
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | PTI | T.38 |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
PTI
PTI Strengths
- Provided a registered MIME type namespace for a specific application's proprietary image format without conflicting with standard web types
Limitations
- Completely undocumented and unsupported in modern ecosystems
- Zero web browser compatibility
- Falls into the 'vanity' tree, making it irrelevant for standard cross-platform data exchange
T.38
T.38 Strengths
- Designed specifically to overcome the timing and packet-loss issues that plague traditional fax over standard VoIP audio codecs (like G.711)
- Reduces bandwidth requirements by transmitting fax protocol data rather than uncompressed audio tones
- Universally supported by enterprise SIP trunks and Session Border Controllers (SBCs) for FoIP
Limitations
- Not an actual image file format, causing confusion due to its 'image/' MIME classification
- Extremely complex to implement correctly over lossy UDP networks (relies on UDPTL redundancy mechanisms)
- Zero support in web browsers or standard image viewing software
When to choose which format
PTI
Use PTI when…
- Legacy Application Specific Workflows
- Proprietary Image Storage
T.38
Use T.38 when…
- Fax over IP (FoIP) Transmissions
- SIP/SDP Media Negotiation
- VoIP Gateways and PBX Systems
- Enterprise Fax Servers