Image MIME Reference
PTI
PTI Image (Personal/Vanity Tree)
image/prs.pti
VS
Silicon Graphics Image
image/x-rgb
SGI-RGB
A complete technical comparison of PTI Image (Personal/Vanity Tree) and Silicon Graphics Image — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | PTI | SGI-RGB |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | ✕ No | Yes |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | ✕ No | ✕ No |
PTI Image (Personal/Vanity Tree)
image/prs.pti
Extension
.pti
Container
Proprietary
Compression
Unknown / Proprietary
Algorithm
Unknown
Color Depth
Unknown
Developed by
Jürn Laun
Released
1999
Magic Bytes
Unknown
Silicon Graphics Image
image/x-rgb
Extension
.rgb.sgi.rgba.bw.int.inta
Container
SGI Image Header (512 bytes)
Compression
Uncompressed / Run-Length Encoding (RLE)
Algorithm
NoneScanline RLE
Color Depth
8-bit (Per Channel), 16-bit (Per Channel)
Developed by
Silicon Graphics, Inc. (Paul Haeberli)
Released
1988
Magic Bytes
01 DA
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | PTI | SGI-RGB |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
PTI
PTI Strengths
- Provided a registered MIME type namespace for a specific application's proprietary image format without conflicting with standard web types
Limitations
- Completely undocumented and unsupported in modern ecosystems
- Zero web browser compatibility
- Falls into the 'vanity' tree, making it irrelevant for standard cross-platform data exchange
SGI-RGB
SGI-RGB Strengths
- Supports 16-bit precision per channel and an embedded alpha channel, making it ideal for the demanding compositing workflows of 1990s cinema VFX
- The scanline-based RLE compression was exceptionally fast to decode on classic MIPS-based SGI workstations
- Features a straightforward 512-byte header, making it relatively easy to parse and write custom decoders in C or Python
Limitations
- Completely obsolete and unsupported in modern web environments
- Replaced entirely by TIFF, OpenEXR, and PNG in modern visual effects and 3D rendering pipelines
- Lacks support for modern color management via ICC profiles or advanced EXIF metadata
When to choose which format
PTI
Use PTI when…
- Legacy Application Specific Workflows
- Proprietary Image Storage
SGI-RGB
Use SGI-RGB when…
- Legacy 3D Animation and VFX Textures
- Silicon Graphics IRIX Workstation Archival
- 1990s Medical Imaging