Image MIME Reference
PTI
PTI Image (Personal/Vanity Tree)
image/prs.pti
VS
PWG Raster Format
image/pwg-raster
PWG-Raster
A complete technical comparison of PTI Image (Personal/Vanity Tree) and PWG Raster Format — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | PTI | PWG-Raster |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | ✕ No | ✕ No |
PTI Image (Personal/Vanity Tree)
image/prs.pti
Extension
.pti
Container
Proprietary
Compression
Unknown / Proprietary
Algorithm
Unknown
Color Depth
Unknown
Developed by
Jürn Laun
Released
1999
Magic Bytes
Unknown
PWG Raster Format
image/pwg-raster
Extension
.pwg.ras
Container
CUPS Raster v2 Container
Compression
PackBits (Run-Length Encoding)
Algorithm
PackBits (Apple RLE variant)
Color Depth
1-bit (Monochrome/K), 8-bit (Grayscale), 24-bit (sRGB / Adobe RGB), 32-bit (CMYK)
Developed by
IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group (PWG)
Released
2011
Magic Bytes
52 61 53 32
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | PTI | PWG-Raster |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
PTI
PTI Strengths
- Provided a registered MIME type namespace for a specific application's proprietary image format without conflicting with standard web types
Limitations
- Completely undocumented and unsupported in modern ecosystems
- Zero web browser compatibility
- Falls into the 'vanity' tree, making it irrelevant for standard cross-platform data exchange
PWG-Raster
PWG-Raster Strengths
- The undisputed global standard for modern, driverless printing environments, eliminating the nightmare of installing manufacturer-specific print drivers
- Extremely lightweight to decode on embedded hardware, requiring minimal RAM buffers on the printer side
- Strict color space and resolution rules guarantee that the printed output will successfully process without syntax errors
Limitations
- Generates massive file sizes and network payloads compared to vector-based formats like PDF or PostScript, as every page is fully rasterized at 300+ DPI before transmission
- No support for native rendering in web browsers, image viewers, or graphic design software without specialized CUPS developer tools
- Cannot store complex metadata, vector text, or layers
When to choose which format
PTI
Use PTI when…
- Legacy Application Specific Workflows
- Proprietary Image Storage
PWG-Raster
Use PWG-Raster when…
- Driverless Network Printing (IPP Everywhere)
- Apple AirPrint and Mopria Print Service Pipelines
- CUPS (Common UNIX Printing System) Spooling