Image MIME Reference
PGM
Portable Graymap
image/x-portable-graymap
VS
TIFF for Facsimile eXtended
image/tiff-fx
TIFF-FX
A complete technical comparison of Portable Graymap and TIFF for Facsimile eXtended — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | PGM | TIFF-FX |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | Yes | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | ✕ No | Yes |
Portable Graymap
image/x-portable-graymap
Extension
.pgm
Container
Netpbm
Compression
Uncompressed
Algorithm
None
Color Depth
8-bit (Grayscale), 16-bit (Grayscale)
Developed by
Jef Poskanzer (Netpbm Project)
Released
1988
Magic Bytes
50 32 (ASCII) or 50 35 (Binary)
TIFF for Facsimile eXtended
image/tiff-fx
Extension
.tiff.tif
Container
TIFF 6.0 Tag Directory Structure
Compression
MH / MR / MMR (CCITT Group 3 & 4) / JBIG / JPEG
Algorithm
CCITT Group 3/4JBIGJPEG
Color Depth
1-bit (Monochrome B&W), 8-bit (Grayscale/Color Indexed), 24-bit (RGB Color)
Developed by
IETF (Internet Engineering Task Force)
Released
1998
Magic Bytes
49 49 2A 00 (Little-Endian) / 4D 4D 00 2A (Big-Endian)
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | PGM | TIFF-FX |
|---|---|---|
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
PGM
PGM Strengths
- Extremely simple format allows custom parsers to be written from scratch in minimal time
- Supports 16-bit precision, making it highly valuable for scientific, medical, and height-map data where 8-bit precision is insufficient
- ASCII encoding ('P2') allows manual editing and visual inspection of pixel values directly within a text editor
Limitations
- Strictly limited to grayscale; cannot display color
- Lack of compression results in massive file sizes, making it entirely impractical for web delivery or consumer storage
- Does not support alpha transparency or modern metadata structures
TIFF-FX
TIFF-FX Strengths
- Provides a universal, standardized format for transmitting multi-page documents over IP networks and email (Internet Fax)
- Supports highly efficient telecom-centric compression algorithms (MMR, JBIG) that produce very small files for text documents
- Maintains backwards compatibility with standard TIFF parsers
Limitations
- Not supported natively by web browsers
- Requires complex parsing of TIFF IFD tags to differentiate a true TIFF-FX file from a standard TIFF file
- Usage is slowly declining as traditional faxing is replaced by secure PDF transmission and e-signature platforms
When to choose which format
PGM
Use PGM when…
- Computer Vision and Machine Learning Pre-processing
- Scientific and Medical Image Processing
- Unix/Linux Command-Line Image Pipelines
TIFF-FX
Use TIFF-FX when…
- Internet Fax (T.37)
- Enterprise Fax Servers
- Document Archiving
- Telecommunications