Image MIME Reference
PBM
Portable Bitmap
image/x-portable-bitmap
VS
SealedMedia SoftSeal JPEG
image/vnd.sealedmedia.softseal.jpg
SoftSeal-JPEG
A complete technical comparison of Portable Bitmap and SealedMedia SoftSeal JPEG — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | PBM | SoftSeal-JPEG |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | ✕ No | ✕ No |
Portable Bitmap
image/x-portable-bitmap
Extension
.pbm
Container
Netpbm
Compression
Uncompressed
Algorithm
None
Color Depth
1-bit (Monochrome)
Developed by
Jef Poskanzer (Netpbm Project)
Released
1988
Magic Bytes
50 31 (ASCII) or 50 34 (Binary)
SealedMedia SoftSeal JPEG
image/vnd.sealedmedia.softseal.jpg
Extension
.sjpg.sealed-jpg.sealed-jpeg
Container
SealedMedia SoftSeal Wrapper
Compression
Encrypted Payload (DCT)
Algorithm
AES EncryptionDiscrete Cosine Transform (Internal JPEG payload)
Color Depth
Encrypted Payload (Historically 24-bit RGB)
Developed by
SealedMedia (Acquired by Oracle Corporation)
Released
Late 1990s
Magic Bytes
Unknown (Proprietary SealedMedia Container)
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | PBM | SoftSeal-JPEG |
|---|---|---|
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
PBM
PBM Strengths
- Absolute structural simplicity allows parsers to be written from scratch with just a few lines of code
- ASCII encoding allows manual editing and debugging directly within a standard text editor
- Serves as a flawless, lossless intermediary for 1-bit raster data like scanned documents or barcodes
Limitations
- Strictly limited to 1-bit monochrome images; cannot natively display shades of gray or color
- Lack of compression results in extremely large file sizes, particularly when using the ASCII 'P1' encoding
- No support for alpha transparency or modern metadata standards like EXIF
SoftSeal-JPEG
SoftSeal-JPEG Strengths
- Offered persistent document security; if a sensitive photo was emailed outside the company, it remained encrypted and unviewable without server authentication
- Administrators possessed the ability to remotely revoke viewing rights to a specific image globally at any time
Limitations
- Completely proprietary and relies on a central authentication server; if the server goes offline or the product is deprecated, the image is permanently inaccessible
- Zero support in modern operating systems, web browsers, or standard image editing suites without heavy enterprise client installations
- Oracle effectively discontinued the IRM product line, stranding many legacy sealed documents
When to choose which format
PBM
Use PBM when…
- Optical Character Recognition (OCR) Pre-processing
- Unix/Linux Command-Line Image Pipelines
- Academic Image Processing Teaching
SoftSeal-JPEG
Use SoftSeal-JPEG when…
- Enterprise Information Rights Management (IRM)
- Secure Distribution of Sensitive Photography
- Revocable Corporate Document Access