Image MIME Reference
Olympus-ORF
Olympus Raw Format
image/x-olympus-orf
VS
Tagged Image File Format (Legacy MIME)
image/x-tiff
TIFF
A complete technical comparison of Olympus Raw Format and Tagged Image File Format (Legacy MIME) — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | Olympus-ORF | TIFF |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | ✕ No | Yes |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | Yes | Yes |
| EXIF Metadata | Yes | Yes |
| ICC Color Profile | Yes | Yes |
Olympus Raw Format
image/x-olympus-orf
Extension
.orf
Container
TIFF-based (with proprietary variants)
Compression
Uncompressed / Proprietary Lossless
Algorithm
NoneOlympus Proprietary Lossless
Color Depth
12-bit (Per Channel)
Developed by
Olympus Corporation (Now OM Digital Solutions)
Released
2000
Magic Bytes
49 49 52 4F (IIRO) or 4D 4D 4F 52 (MMOR) or 49 49 53 52 (IIRS)
Tagged Image File Format (Legacy MIME)
image/x-tiff
Extension
.tiff.tif
Container
IFD (Image File Directory) Tag Structure
Compression
Uncompressed / LZW (Lossless) / ZIP / Deflate (Lossless) / PackBits (Lossless RLE) / JPEG (Lossy) / CCITT Group 3/4 (Fax/Document)
Algorithm
NoneLZWDeflatePackBitsJPEGCCITT
Color Depth
1-bit (Monochrome), 8-bit (Grayscale or Indexed), 16-bit (Per Channel), 32-bit (Float Per Channel)
Developed by
Aldus Corporation (Later acquired by Adobe Systems)
Released
1986
Magic Bytes
49 49 2A 00 (Little-endian) or 4D 4D 00 2A (Big-endian)
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | Olympus-ORF | TIFF |
|---|---|---|
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
Olympus-ORF
Olympus-ORF Strengths
- Retains maximum sensor data, allowing extreme recovery of highlights and shadows that would be permanently lost in a JPEG
- White balance, sharpening, and color profiling are saved as metadata instructions, meaning they can be completely altered in post-production
- Unique magic byte signatures make programmatic file sniffing highly reliable compared to other camera manufacturers' TIFF-spoofing headers
Limitations
- Proprietary format means it requires constant updates to raw processing engines every time a new camera model is released
- Produces very large file sizes (often 15MB to 30MB+ per image depending on sensor resolution)
- Cannot be directly embedded into web pages or used in standard HTML/CSS contexts
TIFF
TIFF Strengths
- Universally accepted as the gold standard for high-fidelity archival and professional print workflows
- Highly adaptable structure supports multiple pages (documents), layers, vast bit depths, and diverse compression algorithms within a single file
- Unmatched support for rich metadata including EXIF, IPTC, XMP, and custom ICC color profiles
Limitations
- Produces exceptionally large file sizes compared to modern web formats
- The 'x-tiff' legacy MIME string forces developers to write extra validation logic to prevent strict security filters from rejecting valid uploads
- The format's immense complexity means that many lightweight parsers only implement a subset of the specification, sometimes failing to read obscure compressions (like CCITT or old JPEG-in-TIFF)
When to choose which format
Olympus-ORF
Use Olympus-ORF when…
- Professional Digital Photography
- Non-destructive Image Post-Processing
- High Dynamic Range (HDR) Imaging Archival
TIFF
Use TIFF when…
- Professional Print and Desktop Publishing
- High-Resolution Archival Scanning
- Master Copies of Digital Photography