Image MIME Reference
Net-FPX
Network FlashPix
image/vnd.net-fpx
VS
Scalable Vector Graphics
image/svg+xml
SVG
A complete technical comparison of Network FlashPix and Scalable Vector Graphics — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
SVG wins on browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | Net-FPX | SVG |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | Yes | Yes |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | Yes |
| Progressive Loading | Yes | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | ✕ No | Yes |
| EXIF Metadata | Yes | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | Yes | ✕ No |
Network FlashPix
image/vnd.net-fpx
Extension
.fpx
Container
Microsoft OLE Structured Storage (COM)
Compression
JPEG (Lossy) / Uncompressed / Single-color (Solid)
Algorithm
JPEGNone
Color Depth
8-bit (Grayscale/Indexed), 24-bit (RGB), 32-bit (CMYK/RGBA)
Developed by
Digital Imaging Group (Kodak, HP, Live Picture, Microsoft)
Released
1996
Magic Bytes
D0 CF 11 E0 A1 B1 1A E1
Scalable Vector Graphics
image/svg+xml
Extension
.svg.svgz
Container
XML Document
Compression
Uncompressed (Plain Text XML) / Lossless (GZIP via .svgz)
Algorithm
None (for .svg)GZIP (for .svgz)
Color Depth
Vector (Independent of bit-depth), CSS Colors (HEX, RGB, HSL, Display-P3)
Developed by
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
Released
2001
Magic Bytes
3C 73 76 67 (for <svg) / 3C 3F 78 6D 6C (for <?xml)
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | Net-FPX | SVG |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ |
✓ All
|
Firefox
|
✕ |
✓ All
|
Safari
|
✕ |
✓ All
|
Edge
|
✕ |
✓ All
|
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ |
✓
|
Net-FPX
Net-FPX Strengths
- Revolutionized web imaging in the late 1990s by proving that massive gigapixel images could be navigated seamlessly over 56k dial-up modems
- Pioneered the tile-based, multi-resolution pyramid concepts that eventually evolved into modern standards like IIIF (International Image Interoperability Framework)
Limitations
- Completely obsolete, having been replaced by standard JPEG servers and modern tiling formats like Deep Zoom or JPEG 2000/XR
- Relied on proprietary Java applets or ActiveX controls to render the tiles dynamically in a web browser
- Extremely complex to parse server-side due to the heavy OLE filesystem container
SVG
SVG Strengths
- Provides infinite resolution scalability, looking perfectly crisp on high-DPI (Retina) displays without increasing file size
- Extremely lightweight compared to raster formats for flat graphics, logos, and UI elements
- Can be manipulated dynamically via the browser's CSS and JavaScript engines (DOM integration)
Limitations
- Unsuitable for complex photographic images or photorealistic textures
- Poses critical security vulnerabilities (XSS and XML External Entity attacks) if user-uploaded SVGs are not heavily sanitized
- Rendering performance degrades significantly if the SVG contains tens of thousands of complex nodes or deeply nested paths
When to choose which format
Net-FPX
Use Net-FPX when…
- Historical Internet Imaging Protocol (IIP) Streaming
- Early E-Commerce Deep Zoom Implementations
- Legacy High-Resolution Image Servers
SVG
Use SVG when…
- Web Logos & UI Icons
- Responsive Web Design Elements
- Interactive Data Visualizations (D3.js)
- CSS and SMIL Web Animations