Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
Net-FPX

Network FlashPix

image/vnd.net-fpx
VS

Portable Bitmap

image/x-portable-bitmap
PBM

A complete technical comparison of Network FlashPix and Portable Bitmap — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature Net-FPX PBM
Transparency (Alpha) Yes ✕ No
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading Yes ✕ No
HDR Support ✕ No ✕ No
EXIF Metadata Yes ✕ No
ICC Color Profile Yes ✕ No
Network FlashPix
image/vnd.net-fpx
Extension
.fpx
Container Microsoft OLE Structured Storage (COM)
Compression JPEG (Lossy) / Uncompressed / Single-color (Solid)
Algorithm
JPEGNone
Color Depth 8-bit (Grayscale/Indexed), 24-bit (RGB), 32-bit (CMYK/RGBA)
Developed by Digital Imaging Group (Kodak, HP, Live Picture, Microsoft)
Released 1996
Magic Bytes
D0 CF 11 E0 A1 B1 1A E1
Full Net-FPX reference →
Portable Bitmap
image/x-portable-bitmap
Extension
.pbm
Container Netpbm
Compression Uncompressed
Algorithm
None
Color Depth 1-bit (Monochrome)
Developed by Jef Poskanzer (Netpbm Project)
Released 1988
Magic Bytes
50 31 (ASCII) or 50 34 (Binary)
Full PBM reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser Net-FPX PBM
Chrome Chrome
✕ ✕
Firefox Firefox
✕ ✕
Safari Safari
✕ ✕
Edge Edge
✕ ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✕ ✕
Net-FPX

Net-FPX Strengths

  • Revolutionized web imaging in the late 1990s by proving that massive gigapixel images could be navigated seamlessly over 56k dial-up modems
  • Pioneered the tile-based, multi-resolution pyramid concepts that eventually evolved into modern standards like IIIF (International Image Interoperability Framework)
Limitations
  • Completely obsolete, having been replaced by standard JPEG servers and modern tiling formats like Deep Zoom or JPEG 2000/XR
  • Relied on proprietary Java applets or ActiveX controls to render the tiles dynamically in a web browser
  • Extremely complex to parse server-side due to the heavy OLE filesystem container
PBM

PBM Strengths

  • Absolute structural simplicity allows parsers to be written from scratch with just a few lines of code
  • ASCII encoding allows manual editing and debugging directly within a standard text editor
  • Serves as a flawless, lossless intermediary for 1-bit raster data like scanned documents or barcodes
Limitations
  • Strictly limited to 1-bit monochrome images; cannot natively display shades of gray or color
  • Lack of compression results in extremely large file sizes, particularly when using the ASCII 'P1' encoding
  • No support for alpha transparency or modern metadata standards like EXIF

When to choose which format

Net-FPX
Use Net-FPX when…
  • Historical Internet Imaging Protocol (IIP) Streaming
  • Early E-Commerce Deep Zoom Implementations
  • Legacy High-Resolution Image Servers
PBM
Use PBM when…
  • Optical Character Recognition (OCR) Pre-processing
  • Unix/Linux Command-Line Image Pipelines
  • Academic Image Processing Teaching

More comparisons

Net-FPX vs ACES → PBM vs ACES → Net-FPX vs APNG → PBM vs APNG → Net-FPX vs AVCI → PBM vs AVCI → Net-FPX vs AVCS → PBM vs AVCS → Net-FPX vs AVIF → PBM vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison