Image MIME Reference
NAPLPS
North American Presentation Level Protocol Syntax
image/naplps
VS
Extended Image File Format
image/vnd.xiff
XIFF
A complete technical comparison of North American Presentation Level Protocol Syntax and Extended Image File Format — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | NAPLPS | XIFF |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | Yes | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | Yes | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | ✕ No | ✕ No |
North American Presentation Level Protocol Syntax
image/naplps
Extension
.nap.naplps
Container
NAPLPS Byte Stream
Compression
Uncompressed (Tokenized ASCII Commands)
Algorithm
None (Coordinate encoding)
Color Depth
16-color palette (Indexed from larger color spaces)
Developed by
ANSI / CSA (Based on Canadian CRC's Telidon)
Released
1983
Magic Bytes
1B (Variable / ESC sequences)
Extended Image File Format
image/vnd.xiff
Extension
.xif
Container
TIFF-based Proprietary Container
Compression
CCITT Group 3 / Group 4 / LZW / Uncompressed
Algorithm
CCITT Group 4LZWNone
Color Depth
1-bit (Monochrome), 8-bit (Grayscale), 24-bit (RGB)
Developed by
Keyfile Corporation
Released
1994
Magic Bytes
49 49 2A 00 or 4D 4D 00 2A
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | NAPLPS | XIFF |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
NAPLPS
NAPLPS Strengths
- Extremely bandwidth-efficient, enabling colorful graphical interfaces over early 300 baud dial-up connections
- Resolution-independent vector scaling allowed the exact same file to be displayed accurately on varied early PC monitors and television sets
Limitations
- Completely obsolete and unsupported by modern web technologies
- Relies heavily on stateful parsing and terminal emulators rather than straightforward file decoding
- Easily misidentified by MIME sniffers as plain text or generic binary streams due to the lack of a standardized file header
XIFF
XIFF Strengths
- Pioneered early enterprise document workflow integration by binding administrative routing data directly to the document image file
- Leveraged efficient fax compression standards to keep storage requirements low on 1990s server infrastructure
Limitations
- Completely proprietary and obsolete; Keyfile Corporation's software ecosystem no longer exists
- Causes widespread MIME type identification conflicts due to sharing the exact same binary header signature as standard TIFF files
- Zero support in modern operating systems or web browsers
When to choose which format
NAPLPS
Use NAPLPS when…
- 1980s Videotex Services
- Prodigy Online Service Graphics
- Historical BBS Terminal Graphics
- Legacy Teletext Broadcasts
XIFF
Use XIFF when…
- Keyfile Enterprise Document Management
- Legacy Corporate Workflow Archival
- Scanned Multi-page Document Routing