Free webp to jpg
Image MIME Reference
NAPLPS

North American Presentation Level Protocol Syntax

image/naplps
VS

Simple Vector Format

image/vnd.svf
SVF

A complete technical comparison of North American Presentation Level Protocol Syntax and Simple Vector Format — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature NAPLPS SVF
Transparency (Alpha) ✕ No Yes
Animation Support Yes ✕ No
Progressive Loading Yes ✕ No
HDR Support ✕ No ✕ No
EXIF Metadata ✕ No ✕ No
ICC Color Profile ✕ No ✕ No
North American Presentation Level Protocol Syntax
image/naplps
Extension
.nap.naplps
Container NAPLPS Byte Stream
Compression Uncompressed (Tokenized ASCII Commands)
Algorithm
None (Coordinate encoding)
Color Depth 16-color palette (Indexed from larger color spaces)
Developed by ANSI / CSA (Based on Canadian CRC's Telidon)
Released 1983
Magic Bytes
1B (Variable / ESC sequences)
Full NAPLPS reference →
Simple Vector Format
image/vnd.svf
Extension
.svf
Container Custom Binary/Text (Legacy) or ZIP (Autodesk Forge)
Compression Uncompressed / Deflate (in modern Autodesk SVF implementations)
Algorithm
None
Color Depth Vector Data (Not Applicable)
Developed by SoftSource & NCSA (National Center for Supercomputing Applications)
Released 1995
Magic Bytes
Unknown (SoftSource SVF)
Full SVF reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser NAPLPS SVF
Chrome Chrome
Firefox Firefox
Safari Safari
Edge Edge
IE IE (Legacy)
NAPLPS

NAPLPS Strengths

  • Extremely bandwidth-efficient, enabling colorful graphical interfaces over early 300 baud dial-up connections
  • Resolution-independent vector scaling allowed the exact same file to be displayed accurately on varied early PC monitors and television sets
Limitations
  • Completely obsolete and unsupported by modern web technologies
  • Relies heavily on stateful parsing and terminal emulators rather than straightforward file decoding
  • Easily misidentified by MIME sniffers as plain text or generic binary streams due to the lack of a standardized file header
SVF

SVF Strengths

  • Acted as a crucial pioneering stepping-stone in proving that scalable, zoomable vector graphics were viable and necessary for the World Wide Web
Limitations
  • Completely obsolete and unsupported by modern web standards
  • Required end-users to install bulky, proprietary browser plugins
  • Causes significant developer confusion today due to Autodesk adopting the exact same acronym and file extension for a completely different technology

When to choose which format

NAPLPS
Use NAPLPS when…
  • 1980s Videotex Services
  • Prodigy Online Service Graphics
  • Historical BBS Terminal Graphics
  • Legacy Teletext Broadcasts
SVF
Use SVF when…
  • Historical Web-based CAD Viewers (1990s)
  • Legacy 2D Vector Archival
  • Autodesk Platform Services (Forge) Model Translation (Name Collision)
Share this comparison