Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
NAPLPS

North American Presentation Level Protocol Syntax

image/naplps
VS

Portable Pixmap

image/x-portable-pixmap
PPM

A complete technical comparison of North American Presentation Level Protocol Syntax and Portable Pixmap — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature NAPLPS PPM
Transparency (Alpha) ✕ No ✕ No
Animation Support Yes ✕ No
Progressive Loading Yes ✕ No
HDR Support ✕ No Yes
EXIF Metadata ✕ No ✕ No
ICC Color Profile ✕ No ✕ No
North American Presentation Level Protocol Syntax
image/naplps
Extension
.nap.naplps
Container NAPLPS Byte Stream
Compression Uncompressed (Tokenized ASCII Commands)
Algorithm
None (Coordinate encoding)
Color Depth 16-color palette (Indexed from larger color spaces)
Developed by ANSI / CSA (Based on Canadian CRC's Telidon)
Released 1983
Magic Bytes
1B (Variable / ESC sequences)
Full NAPLPS reference →
Portable Pixmap
image/x-portable-pixmap
Extension
.ppm
Container Netpbm
Compression Uncompressed
Algorithm
None
Color Depth 24-bit (RGB), 48-bit (RGB High Color)
Developed by Jef Poskanzer (Netpbm Project)
Released 1988
Magic Bytes
50 33 (ASCII) or 50 36 (Binary)
Full PPM reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser NAPLPS PPM
Chrome Chrome
✕ ✕
Firefox Firefox
✕ ✕
Safari Safari
✕ ✕
Edge Edge
✕ ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✕ ✕
NAPLPS

NAPLPS Strengths

  • Extremely bandwidth-efficient, enabling colorful graphical interfaces over early 300 baud dial-up connections
  • Resolution-independent vector scaling allowed the exact same file to be displayed accurately on varied early PC monitors and television sets
Limitations
  • Completely obsolete and unsupported by modern web technologies
  • Relies heavily on stateful parsing and terminal emulators rather than straightforward file decoding
  • Easily misidentified by MIME sniffers as plain text or generic binary streams due to the lack of a standardized file header
PPM

PPM Strengths

  • Absolute structural simplicity allows parsers and renderers (such as custom raytracers) to write directly to the format with virtually no overhead or external libraries
  • Supports 16-bit per channel (48-bit total) precision, preserving deep color accuracy before converting to final delivery formats
  • ASCII encoding ('P3') allows manual editing and visual inspection of RGB values directly within a text editor
Limitations
  • Zero compression results in astronomical file sizes, making it entirely impractical for web delivery or consumer storage
  • Does not natively support an alpha channel for transparency (this is handled by the newer PAM extension format within the Netpbm suite)
  • Lacks support for modern metadata standards like EXIF, XMP, or embedded ICC color profiles

When to choose which format

NAPLPS
Use NAPLPS when…
  • 1980s Videotex Services
  • Prodigy Online Service Graphics
  • Historical BBS Terminal Graphics
  • Legacy Teletext Broadcasts
PPM
Use PPM when…
  • Intermediary Format for Image Format Conversion
  • Academic Computer Graphics and Raytracing Output
  • Unix/Linux Command-Line Image Pipelines

More comparisons

NAPLPS vs ACES → PPM vs ACES → NAPLPS vs APNG → PPM vs APNG → NAPLPS vs AVCI → PPM vs AVCI → NAPLPS vs AVCS → PPM vs AVCS → NAPLPS vs AVIF → PPM vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison