Free webp to jpg
Image MIME Reference
NAPLPS

North American Presentation Level Protocol Syntax

image/naplps
VS

Pentax Electronic File

image/x-pentax-pef
Pentax-PEF

A complete technical comparison of North American Presentation Level Protocol Syntax and Pentax Electronic File — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature NAPLPS Pentax-PEF
Transparency (Alpha) ✕ No ✕ No
Animation Support Yes ✕ No
Progressive Loading Yes ✕ No
HDR Support ✕ No Yes
EXIF Metadata ✕ No Yes
ICC Color Profile ✕ No Yes
North American Presentation Level Protocol Syntax
image/naplps
Extension
.nap.naplps
Container NAPLPS Byte Stream
Compression Uncompressed (Tokenized ASCII Commands)
Algorithm
None (Coordinate encoding)
Color Depth 16-color palette (Indexed from larger color spaces)
Developed by ANSI / CSA (Based on Canadian CRC's Telidon)
Released 1983
Magic Bytes
1B (Variable / ESC sequences)
Full NAPLPS reference →
Pentax Electronic File
image/x-pentax-pef
Extension
.pef
Container TIFF-based (Proprietary)
Compression Uncompressed / Proprietary Lossless
Algorithm
NonePentax Proprietary Lossless
Color Depth 12-bit (Per Channel), 14-bit (Per Channel)
Developed by Pentax (now Ricoh Imaging Company, Ltd.)
Released 2003
Magic Bytes
49 49 2A 00 (Little-endian) or 4D 4D 00 2A (Big-endian)
Full Pentax-PEF reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser NAPLPS Pentax-PEF
Chrome Chrome
Firefox Firefox
Safari Safari
Edge Edge
IE IE (Legacy)
NAPLPS

NAPLPS Strengths

  • Extremely bandwidth-efficient, enabling colorful graphical interfaces over early 300 baud dial-up connections
  • Resolution-independent vector scaling allowed the exact same file to be displayed accurately on varied early PC monitors and television sets
Limitations
  • Completely obsolete and unsupported by modern web technologies
  • Relies heavily on stateful parsing and terminal emulators rather than straightforward file decoding
  • Easily misidentified by MIME sniffers as plain text or generic binary streams due to the lack of a standardized file header
Pentax-PEF

Pentax-PEF Strengths

  • Retains absolute maximum sensor data, enabling massive shadow recovery and highlight protection compared to compressed in-camera JPEGs
  • White balance and sharpening are saved as metadata instructions rather than 'baked in', meaning they can be perfectly adjusted in post-production
  • Utilizes the standard TIFF container structure, making it relatively straightforward for open-source software like LibRaw to parse
Limitations
  • Proprietary format requires continuous updates to third-party processing software whenever Pentax releases a new camera model (unlike the open DNG format)
  • Produces very large file sizes compared to standard web formats
  • Cannot be directly embedded into web pages or used in standard HTML/CSS contexts

When to choose which format

NAPLPS
Use NAPLPS when…
  • 1980s Videotex Services
  • Prodigy Online Service Graphics
  • Historical BBS Terminal Graphics
  • Legacy Teletext Broadcasts
Pentax-PEF
Use Pentax-PEF when…
  • Professional Digital Photography
  • Non-destructive Image Post-Processing
  • Pentax Camera Archival
Share this comparison