Image MIME Reference
MODI
Microsoft Document Imaging
image/vnd.ms-modi
VS
T.38 Fax over IP (FoIP)
image/t38
T.38
A complete technical comparison of Microsoft Document Imaging and T.38 Fax over IP (FoIP) — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | MODI | T.38 |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | ✕ No | ✕ No |
Microsoft Document Imaging
image/vnd.ms-modi
Extension
.mdi
Container
TIFF Variant
Compression
LZW / Proprietary MS Compression
Algorithm
LZW (Modified)
Color Depth
1-bit (Monochrome), 8-bit (Grayscale), 24-bit (RGB)
Developed by
Microsoft Corporation
Released
2001
Magic Bytes
49 49 2A 00
T.38 Fax over IP (FoIP)
image/t38
Extension
.t38
Container
UDPTL or TCP (Network Transport)
Compression
Lossless (MH, MR, MMR / T.4, T.6)
Algorithm
MH (Modified Huffman)MR (Modified Read)MMR (Modified Modified Read)
Color Depth
1-bit (Monochrome B&W)
Developed by
ITU-T (International Telecommunication Union)
Released
1998
Magic Bytes
None (Network Stream)
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | MODI | T.38 |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
MODI
MODI Strengths
- Historically provided an excellent all-in-one scanned document format with built-in OCR and annotations before PDF editing became universally accessible
- Tightly integrated with Microsoft Office and SharePoint workflows in the early 2000s
Limitations
- Completely proprietary and obsolete; Microsoft abandoned it in favor of standard TIFF and PDF
- Causes widespread identification conflicts since its file signature is identical to a standard TIFF
- Extremely difficult to open on modern operating systems without relying on third-party conversion utilities
T.38
T.38 Strengths
- Designed specifically to overcome the timing and packet-loss issues that plague traditional fax over standard VoIP audio codecs (like G.711)
- Reduces bandwidth requirements by transmitting fax protocol data rather than uncompressed audio tones
- Universally supported by enterprise SIP trunks and Session Border Controllers (SBCs) for FoIP
Limitations
- Not an actual image file format, causing confusion due to its 'image/' MIME classification
- Extremely complex to implement correctly over lossy UDP networks (relies on UDPTL redundancy mechanisms)
- Zero support in web browsers or standard image viewing software
When to choose which format
MODI
Use MODI when…
- Legacy Scanned Document Archival
- Microsoft Office XP/2003/2007 Workflows
- Embedded OCR Text Storage
T.38
Use T.38 when…
- Fax over IP (FoIP) Transmissions
- SIP/SDP Media Negotiation
- VoIP Gateways and PBX Systems
- Enterprise Fax Servers