Image MIME Reference
MODI
Microsoft Document Imaging
image/vnd.ms-modi
VS
Sony SR2 Raw Image
image/x-sony-sr2
Sony-SR2
A complete technical comparison of Microsoft Document Imaging and Sony SR2 Raw Image — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | MODI | Sony-SR2 |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | ✕ No | Yes |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | Yes |
| ICC Color Profile | ✕ No | Yes |
Microsoft Document Imaging
image/vnd.ms-modi
Extension
.mdi
Container
TIFF Variant
Compression
LZW / Proprietary MS Compression
Algorithm
LZW (Modified)
Color Depth
1-bit (Monochrome), 8-bit (Grayscale), 24-bit (RGB)
Developed by
Microsoft Corporation
Released
2001
Magic Bytes
49 49 2A 00
Sony SR2 Raw Image
image/x-sony-sr2
Extension
.sr2
Container
TIFF-based (Proprietary)
Compression
Uncompressed / Sony Proprietary Lossless
Algorithm
NoneSony Proprietary Lossless
Color Depth
12-bit (Per Channel)
Developed by
Sony Corporation
Released
2005
Magic Bytes
49 49 2A 00
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | MODI | Sony-SR2 |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
MODI
MODI Strengths
- Historically provided an excellent all-in-one scanned document format with built-in OCR and annotations before PDF editing became universally accessible
- Tightly integrated with Microsoft Office and SharePoint workflows in the early 2000s
Limitations
- Completely proprietary and obsolete; Microsoft abandoned it in favor of standard TIFF and PDF
- Causes widespread identification conflicts since its file signature is identical to a standard TIFF
- Extremely difficult to open on modern operating systems without relying on third-party conversion utilities
Sony-SR2
Sony-SR2 Strengths
- Retains raw, unprocessed sensor data from legacy cameras, allowing modern raw processors to extract vastly superior image quality than what was possible in 2005
- Utilizes a standard TIFF container structure, ensuring that community-maintained open-source decoding libraries (like LibRaw) can easily parse and maintain support for it indefinitely
Limitations
- Completely obsolete format that has not been utilized in a new camera release in over a decade
- MIME detection via magic bytes is unreliable due to TIFF header spoofing, requiring deeper EXIF inspection
- Cannot be natively viewed in web browsers or standard operating system image viewers without specialized decoders
When to choose which format
MODI
Use MODI when…
- Legacy Scanned Document Archival
- Microsoft Office XP/2003/2007 Workflows
- Embedded OCR Text Storage
Sony-SR2
Use Sony-SR2 when…
- Legacy Sony Cyber-shot/Alpha Photography
- Non-destructive Image Post-Processing
- Raw Imaging Archival