Image MIME Reference
MODI
Microsoft Document Imaging
image/vnd.ms-modi
VS
Adobe Photoshop Document
image/vnd.adobe.photoshop
PSD
A complete technical comparison of Microsoft Document Imaging and Adobe Photoshop Document — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | MODI | PSD |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | ✕ No | Yes |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | Yes |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | ✕ No | Yes |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | Yes |
| ICC Color Profile | ✕ No | Yes |
Microsoft Document Imaging
image/vnd.ms-modi
Extension
.mdi
Container
TIFF Variant
Compression
LZW / Proprietary MS Compression
Algorithm
LZW (Modified)
Color Depth
1-bit (Monochrome), 8-bit (Grayscale), 24-bit (RGB)
Developed by
Microsoft Corporation
Released
2001
Magic Bytes
49 49 2A 00
Adobe Photoshop Document
image/vnd.adobe.photoshop
Extension
.psd.psb.pdd
Container
Adobe Photoshop Document (PSD/PSB)
Compression
Uncompressed / RLE (Run-Length Encoding) / ZIP
Algorithm
RLEZIP (with or without prediction)None
Color Depth
1-bit (Bitmap), 8-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit (Float/HDR)
Developed by
Adobe Systems
Released
1990
Magic Bytes
38 42 50 53
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | MODI | PSD |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
MODI
MODI Strengths
- Historically provided an excellent all-in-one scanned document format with built-in OCR and annotations before PDF editing became universally accessible
- Tightly integrated with Microsoft Office and SharePoint workflows in the early 2000s
Limitations
- Completely proprietary and obsolete; Microsoft abandoned it in favor of standard TIFF and PDF
- Causes widespread identification conflicts since its file signature is identical to a standard TIFF
- Extremely difficult to open on modern operating systems without relying on third-party conversion utilities
PSD
PSD Strengths
- The undisputed global standard for layered raster graphics and non-destructive image editing
- Supports incredibly complex compositions combining raster data, vector shapes, live text, and adjustment layers
- Full support for advanced color spaces (CMYK, Lab, multi-channel) and 32-bit floating-point HDR workflows
Limitations
- Proprietary format: while the specification is published, complete feature-parity is rarely achieved by third-party software (e.g., smart objects and complex layer styles often break)
- Files can reach enormous sizes (gigabytes) due to the preservation of unflattened, high-resolution layer data
- Zero support for native rendering in web browsers or standard mobile image viewers
When to choose which format
MODI
Use MODI when…
- Legacy Scanned Document Archival
- Microsoft Office XP/2003/2007 Workflows
- Embedded OCR Text Storage
PSD
Use PSD when…
- Professional Photo Retouching
- Digital Painting and Illustration
- UI/UX Design Workflows
- Graphic Design and Print Production