Free webp to jpg
Image MIME Reference
MODI

Microsoft Document Imaging

image/vnd.ms-modi
VS

Portable Anymap

image/x-portable-anymap
PNM

A complete technical comparison of Microsoft Document Imaging and Portable Anymap — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature MODI PNM
Transparency (Alpha) ✕ No ✕ No
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No ✕ No
HDR Support ✕ No ✕ No
EXIF Metadata ✕ No ✕ No
ICC Color Profile ✕ No ✕ No
Microsoft Document Imaging
image/vnd.ms-modi
Extension
.mdi
Container TIFF Variant
Compression LZW / Proprietary MS Compression
Algorithm
LZW (Modified)
Color Depth 1-bit (Monochrome), 8-bit (Grayscale), 24-bit (RGB)
Developed by Microsoft Corporation
Released 2001
Magic Bytes
49 49 2A 00
Full MODI reference →
Portable Anymap
image/x-portable-anymap
Extension
.pnm
Container Netpbm
Compression Uncompressed
Algorithm
None
Color Depth 1-bit (PBM), 8-bit to 16-bit (PGM), 24-bit to 48-bit (PPM)
Developed by Jef Poskanzer (Netpbm Project)
Released 1988
Magic Bytes
50 31, 50 32, 50 33, 50 34, 50 35, or 50 36
Full PNM reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser MODI PNM
Chrome Chrome
Firefox Firefox
Safari Safari
Edge Edge
IE IE (Legacy)
MODI

MODI Strengths

  • Historically provided an excellent all-in-one scanned document format with built-in OCR and annotations before PDF editing became universally accessible
  • Tightly integrated with Microsoft Office and SharePoint workflows in the early 2000s
Limitations
  • Completely proprietary and obsolete; Microsoft abandoned it in favor of standard TIFF and PDF
  • Causes widespread identification conflicts since its file signature is identical to a standard TIFF
  • Extremely difficult to open on modern operating systems without relying on third-party conversion utilities
PNM

PNM Strengths

  • Unparalleled simplicity: parsers and writers for PNM files can be written from scratch in C or Python in just a few minutes without relying on external libraries
  • Serves as an excellent foundational teaching tool for computer science students learning about image arrays and raster graphics
  • Flawlessly pipes through Unix command-line utilities for robust automated image processing (via the Netpbm suite)
Limitations
  • Zero compression natively results in astronomical file sizes, making it entirely impractical for web delivery or consumer storage
  • No support for standard metadata formats like EXIF, XMP, or ICC color profiles
  • No native alpha channel support in the classic PNM specification (though the newer PAM format 'P7' addresses this)

When to choose which format

MODI
Use MODI when…
  • Legacy Scanned Document Archival
  • Microsoft Office XP/2003/2007 Workflows
  • Embedded OCR Text Storage
PNM
Use PNM when…
  • Unix/Linux Command-Line Image Processing (Netpbm suite)
  • Academic Computer Vision Research
  • Intermediary Format for Image Format Conversion
Share this comparison