Image MIME Reference
MODI
Microsoft Document Imaging
image/vnd.ms-modi
VS
Progressive JPEG (Legacy IE Alias)
image/pjpeg
PJPEG
A complete technical comparison of Microsoft Document Imaging and Progressive JPEG (Legacy IE Alias) — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
PJPEG wins on browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | MODI | PJPEG |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | Yes |
| HDR Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | Yes |
| ICC Color Profile | ✕ No | Yes |
Microsoft Document Imaging
image/vnd.ms-modi
Extension
.mdi
Container
TIFF Variant
Compression
LZW / Proprietary MS Compression
Algorithm
LZW (Modified)
Color Depth
1-bit (Monochrome), 8-bit (Grayscale), 24-bit (RGB)
Developed by
Microsoft Corporation
Released
2001
Magic Bytes
49 49 2A 00
Progressive JPEG (Legacy IE Alias)
image/pjpeg
Extension
.jpeg.jpg.pjpeg.pjp.jfif
Container
JPEG (ISO/IEC 10918-1)
Compression
Lossy (DCT)
Algorithm
Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT)
Color Depth
8-bit, 12-bit
Developed by
Joint Photographic Experts Group / Microsoft (Alias)
Released
1992
Magic Bytes
FF D8 FF E0 (JFIF) / FF D8 FF E1 (Exif)
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | MODI | PJPEG |
|---|---|---|
|
|
✕ |
✓ All
|
|
|
✕ |
✓ All
|
|
|
✕ |
✓ All
|
|
|
✕ |
✓ All
|
|
|
✕ |
✓
|
MODI
MODI Strengths
- Historically provided an excellent all-in-one scanned document format with built-in OCR and annotations before PDF editing became universally accessible
- Tightly integrated with Microsoft Office and SharePoint workflows in the early 2000s
Limitations
- Completely proprietary and obsolete; Microsoft abandoned it in favor of standard TIFF and PDF
- Causes widespread identification conflicts since its file signature is identical to a standard TIFF
- Extremely difficult to open on modern operating systems without relying on third-party conversion utilities
PJPEG
PJPEG Strengths
- Progressive JPEGs (which this MIME type attempted to describe) provide excellent perceived loading speeds on slow connections by rendering a low-resolution preview first
- Files sent with this MIME type are fully backwards compatible with any standard JPEG decoder
Limitations
- It is a non-standard MIME type that violates IANA specifications
- Causes strict file upload validation scripts to fail if not explicitly whitelisted or mapped
- Creates unnecessary confusion, as the official image/jpeg MIME type already fully encompasses progressive encoding
When to choose which format
MODI
Use MODI when…
- Legacy Scanned Document Archival
- Microsoft Office XP/2003/2007 Workflows
- Embedded OCR Text Storage
PJPEG
Use PJPEG when…
- Legacy Internet Explorer File Uploads
- Progressive Image Rendering (Historical context)