Image MIME Reference
MODI
Microsoft Document Imaging
image/vnd.ms-modi
VS
PiCture eXchange
image/x-pcx
PCX
A complete technical comparison of Microsoft Document Imaging and PiCture eXchange — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | MODI | PCX |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | ✕ No | ✕ No |
Microsoft Document Imaging
image/vnd.ms-modi
Extension
.mdi
Container
TIFF Variant
Compression
LZW / Proprietary MS Compression
Algorithm
LZW (Modified)
Color Depth
1-bit (Monochrome), 8-bit (Grayscale), 24-bit (RGB)
Developed by
Microsoft Corporation
Released
2001
Magic Bytes
49 49 2A 00
PiCture eXchange
image/x-pcx
Extension
.pcx
Container
ZSoft Proprietary Header (128 bytes)
Compression
Run-Length Encoding (RLE)
Algorithm
ZSoft RLE
Color Depth
1-bit (Monochrome), 4-bit (16 colors), 8-bit (256 colors), 24-bit (True Color)
Developed by
ZSoft Corporation
Released
1985
Magic Bytes
0A (followed by version, e.g., 0A 05 01 08)
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | MODI | PCX |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
MODI
MODI Strengths
- Historically provided an excellent all-in-one scanned document format with built-in OCR and annotations before PDF editing became universally accessible
- Tightly integrated with Microsoft Office and SharePoint workflows in the early 2000s
Limitations
- Completely proprietary and obsolete; Microsoft abandoned it in favor of standard TIFF and PDF
- Causes widespread identification conflicts since its file signature is identical to a standard TIFF
- Extremely difficult to open on modern operating systems without relying on third-party conversion utilities
PCX
PCX Strengths
- Incredibly simple RLE algorithm makes it very fast to decode, which was historically vital for early 3D video game engines
- Retains crisp, lossless pixel data suitable for pixel art and interface assets
- Well-documented and highly supported by older desktop publishing and image editing software
Limitations
- Extremely inefficient compression by modern standards, producing large file sizes compared to PNG
- Lacks modern imaging features such as alpha channel transparency, EXIF metadata, and color profiles
- Zero support in web browsers; must be converted to PNG for web use
When to choose which format
MODI
Use MODI when…
- Legacy Scanned Document Archival
- Microsoft Office XP/2003/2007 Workflows
- Embedded OCR Text Storage
PCX
Use PCX when…
- MS-DOS and Early Windows Graphics
- 1990s Video Game Assets (Textures, UI)
- Retro Computing Archival