Image MIME Reference
MODI
Microsoft Document Imaging
image/vnd.ms-modi
VS
Portable Bitmap
image/x-portable-bitmap
PBM
A complete technical comparison of Microsoft Document Imaging and Portable Bitmap — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | MODI | PBM |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | ✕ No | ✕ No |
Microsoft Document Imaging
image/vnd.ms-modi
Extension
.mdi
Container
TIFF Variant
Compression
LZW / Proprietary MS Compression
Algorithm
LZW (Modified)
Color Depth
1-bit (Monochrome), 8-bit (Grayscale), 24-bit (RGB)
Developed by
Microsoft Corporation
Released
2001
Magic Bytes
49 49 2A 00
Portable Bitmap
image/x-portable-bitmap
Extension
.pbm
Container
Netpbm
Compression
Uncompressed
Algorithm
None
Color Depth
1-bit (Monochrome)
Developed by
Jef Poskanzer (Netpbm Project)
Released
1988
Magic Bytes
50 31 (ASCII) or 50 34 (Binary)
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | MODI | PBM |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
MODI
MODI Strengths
- Historically provided an excellent all-in-one scanned document format with built-in OCR and annotations before PDF editing became universally accessible
- Tightly integrated with Microsoft Office and SharePoint workflows in the early 2000s
Limitations
- Completely proprietary and obsolete; Microsoft abandoned it in favor of standard TIFF and PDF
- Causes widespread identification conflicts since its file signature is identical to a standard TIFF
- Extremely difficult to open on modern operating systems without relying on third-party conversion utilities
PBM
PBM Strengths
- Absolute structural simplicity allows parsers to be written from scratch with just a few lines of code
- ASCII encoding allows manual editing and debugging directly within a standard text editor
- Serves as a flawless, lossless intermediary for 1-bit raster data like scanned documents or barcodes
Limitations
- Strictly limited to 1-bit monochrome images; cannot natively display shades of gray or color
- Lack of compression results in extremely large file sizes, particularly when using the ASCII 'P1' encoding
- No support for alpha transparency or modern metadata standards like EXIF
When to choose which format
MODI
Use MODI when…
- Legacy Scanned Document Archival
- Microsoft Office XP/2003/2007 Workflows
- Embedded OCR Text Storage
PBM
Use PBM when…
- Optical Character Recognition (OCR) Pre-processing
- Unix/Linux Command-Line Image Pipelines
- Academic Image Processing Teaching