Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
Kodak-KDC

Kodak KDC Raw Image

image/x-kodak-kdc
VS

PWG Raster Format

image/pwg-raster
PWG-Raster

A complete technical comparison of Kodak KDC Raw Image and PWG Raster Format — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature Kodak-KDC PWG-Raster
Transparency (Alpha) ✕ No ✕ No
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No ✕ No
HDR Support Yes ✕ No
EXIF Metadata Yes ✕ No
ICC Color Profile Yes ✕ No
Kodak KDC Raw Image
image/x-kodak-kdc
Extension
.kdc
Container TIFF/EP
Compression Uncompressed / Proprietary Lossless
Algorithm
NoneLossless JPEG (ITU-T81)Proprietary Kodak Compression
Color Depth 10-bit, 12-bit (Per Channel)
Developed by Eastman Kodak Company
Released 1995
Magic Bytes
49 49 2A 00 or 4D 4D 00 2A
Full Kodak-KDC reference →
PWG Raster Format
image/pwg-raster
Extension
.pwg.ras
Container CUPS Raster v2 Container
Compression PackBits (Run-Length Encoding)
Algorithm
PackBits (Apple RLE variant)
Color Depth 1-bit (Monochrome/K), 8-bit (Grayscale), 24-bit (sRGB / Adobe RGB), 32-bit (CMYK)
Developed by IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group (PWG)
Released 2011
Magic Bytes
52 61 53 32
Full PWG-Raster reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser Kodak-KDC PWG-Raster
Chrome Chrome
✕ ✕
Firefox Firefox
✕ ✕
Safari Safari
✕ ✕
Edge Edge
✕ ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✕ ✕
Kodak-KDC

Kodak-KDC Strengths

  • Preserves original raw sensor data, allowing modern demosaicing software to extract significantly more detail and dynamic range than the camera's built-in JPEG engine could at the time
  • Utilizes the standard TIFF container structure, ensuring broad compatibility with open-source decoding libraries (like LibRaw)
Limitations
  • Completely obsolete proprietary format tied to a defunct line of consumer digital cameras
  • Subject to widespread misidentification by automated MIME detection libraries due to structural similarities with standard TIFFs
  • Cannot be natively viewed in web browsers or standard operating system image viewers without specialized decoders
PWG-Raster

PWG-Raster Strengths

  • The undisputed global standard for modern, driverless printing environments, eliminating the nightmare of installing manufacturer-specific print drivers
  • Extremely lightweight to decode on embedded hardware, requiring minimal RAM buffers on the printer side
  • Strict color space and resolution rules guarantee that the printed output will successfully process without syntax errors
Limitations
  • Generates massive file sizes and network payloads compared to vector-based formats like PDF or PostScript, as every page is fully rasterized at 300+ DPI before transmission
  • No support for native rendering in web browsers, image viewers, or graphic design software without specialized CUPS developer tools
  • Cannot store complex metadata, vector text, or layers

When to choose which format

Kodak-KDC
Use Kodak-KDC when…
  • Vintage Digital Photography Archival
  • Kodak DC and EasyShare P-Series Raw Post-Processing
  • Historical Imaging Research
PWG-Raster
Use PWG-Raster when…
  • Driverless Network Printing (IPP Everywhere)
  • Apple AirPrint and Mopria Print Service Pipelines
  • CUPS (Common UNIX Printing System) Spooling

More comparisons

Kodak-KDC vs ACES → PWG-Raster vs ACES → Kodak-KDC vs APNG → PWG-Raster vs APNG → Kodak-KDC vs AVCI → PWG-Raster vs AVCI → Kodak-KDC vs AVCS → PWG-Raster vs AVCS → Kodak-KDC vs AVIF → PWG-Raster vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison