Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
Kodak-KDC

Kodak KDC Raw Image

image/x-kodak-kdc
VS

Portable Bitmap

image/x-portable-bitmap
PBM

A complete technical comparison of Kodak KDC Raw Image and Portable Bitmap — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature Kodak-KDC PBM
Transparency (Alpha) ✕ No ✕ No
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No ✕ No
HDR Support Yes ✕ No
EXIF Metadata Yes ✕ No
ICC Color Profile Yes ✕ No
Kodak KDC Raw Image
image/x-kodak-kdc
Extension
.kdc
Container TIFF/EP
Compression Uncompressed / Proprietary Lossless
Algorithm
NoneLossless JPEG (ITU-T81)Proprietary Kodak Compression
Color Depth 10-bit, 12-bit (Per Channel)
Developed by Eastman Kodak Company
Released 1995
Magic Bytes
49 49 2A 00 or 4D 4D 00 2A
Full Kodak-KDC reference →
Portable Bitmap
image/x-portable-bitmap
Extension
.pbm
Container Netpbm
Compression Uncompressed
Algorithm
None
Color Depth 1-bit (Monochrome)
Developed by Jef Poskanzer (Netpbm Project)
Released 1988
Magic Bytes
50 31 (ASCII) or 50 34 (Binary)
Full PBM reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser Kodak-KDC PBM
Chrome Chrome
✕ ✕
Firefox Firefox
✕ ✕
Safari Safari
✕ ✕
Edge Edge
✕ ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✕ ✕
Kodak-KDC

Kodak-KDC Strengths

  • Preserves original raw sensor data, allowing modern demosaicing software to extract significantly more detail and dynamic range than the camera's built-in JPEG engine could at the time
  • Utilizes the standard TIFF container structure, ensuring broad compatibility with open-source decoding libraries (like LibRaw)
Limitations
  • Completely obsolete proprietary format tied to a defunct line of consumer digital cameras
  • Subject to widespread misidentification by automated MIME detection libraries due to structural similarities with standard TIFFs
  • Cannot be natively viewed in web browsers or standard operating system image viewers without specialized decoders
PBM

PBM Strengths

  • Absolute structural simplicity allows parsers to be written from scratch with just a few lines of code
  • ASCII encoding allows manual editing and debugging directly within a standard text editor
  • Serves as a flawless, lossless intermediary for 1-bit raster data like scanned documents or barcodes
Limitations
  • Strictly limited to 1-bit monochrome images; cannot natively display shades of gray or color
  • Lack of compression results in extremely large file sizes, particularly when using the ASCII 'P1' encoding
  • No support for alpha transparency or modern metadata standards like EXIF

When to choose which format

Kodak-KDC
Use Kodak-KDC when…
  • Vintage Digital Photography Archival
  • Kodak DC and EasyShare P-Series Raw Post-Processing
  • Historical Imaging Research
PBM
Use PBM when…
  • Optical Character Recognition (OCR) Pre-processing
  • Unix/Linux Command-Line Image Pipelines
  • Academic Image Processing Teaching

More comparisons

Kodak-KDC vs ACES → PBM vs ACES → Kodak-KDC vs APNG → PBM vs APNG → Kodak-KDC vs AVCI → PBM vs AVCI → Kodak-KDC vs AVCS → PBM vs AVCS → Kodak-KDC vs AVIF → PBM vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison