Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
Kodak-K25

Kodak K25 Raw Image

image/x-kodak-k25
VS

Silicon Graphics Image

image/sgi
SGI

A complete technical comparison of Kodak K25 Raw Image and Silicon Graphics Image — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature Kodak-K25 SGI
Transparency (Alpha) ✕ No Yes
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No ✕ No
HDR Support Yes ✕ No
EXIF Metadata Yes ✕ No
ICC Color Profile ✕ No ✕ No
Kodak K25 Raw Image
image/x-kodak-k25
Extension
.k25
Container Proprietary Kodak Raw (TIFF-based variant)
Compression Uncompressed / Proprietary Lossless
Algorithm
Proprietary Kodak Compression
Color Depth 10-bit, 12-bit (Per Channel)
Developed by Eastman Kodak Company
Released 1996
Magic Bytes
Varies (Often resembles TIFF header 49 49 2A 00 or requires proprietary parsing)
Full Kodak-K25 reference →
Silicon Graphics Image
image/sgi
Extension
.sgi.rgb.rgba.bw.int.inta
Container SGI Image Format
Compression Uncompressed / Lossless (Run-Length Encoding)
Algorithm
RLENone
Color Depth 8-bit, 16-bit (Per Channel)
Developed by Paul Haeberli (Silicon Graphics)
Released 1990
Magic Bytes
01 DA
Full SGI reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser Kodak-K25 SGI
Chrome Chrome
✕ ✕
Firefox Firefox
✕ ✕
Safari Safari
✕ ✕
Edge Edge
✕ ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✕ ✕
Kodak-K25

Kodak-K25 Strengths

  • Historically significant format tied to the first digital camera to adopt CompactFlash memory
  • Preserves original raw sensor data, allowing modern demosaicing algorithms (via LibRaw) to extract much better image quality than 1996-era software could
Limitations
  • Completely obsolete and deeply proprietary, lacking modern raw format features found in DNG
  • Cannot be natively viewed in web browsers or standard operating system image viewers without specialized decoders
  • Subject to misidentification by automated MIME detection libraries due to structural similarities with standard TIFFs
SGI

SGI Strengths

  • Pioneered multi-channel and 16-bit per channel imaging capabilities required for high-end 1990s visual effects
  • Extremely robust and simple header structure
  • Reliable Run-Length Encoding provided solid lossless compression for flat-shaded 3D renders
Limitations
  • Completely obsolete for modern web and application development
  • Zero native web browser compatibility
  • Largely replaced by TIFF and OpenEXR in modern professional VFX and 3D pipelines

When to choose which format

Kodak-K25
Use Kodak-K25 when…
  • Vintage Digital Photography Archival
  • Kodak DC25 Camera Restorations
  • Historical Imaging Research
SGI
Use SGI when…
  • Legacy 3D Animation & VFX
  • Silicon Graphics IRIX Workflows
  • Historical CGI Archiving

More comparisons

Kodak-K25 vs ACES → SGI vs ACES → Kodak-K25 vs APNG → SGI vs APNG → Kodak-K25 vs AVCI → SGI vs AVCI → Kodak-K25 vs AVCS → SGI vs AVCS → Kodak-K25 vs AVIF → SGI vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison