Image MIME Reference
JXL
JPEG XL
image/jxl
VS
X Pixmap
image/x-xpixmap
XPM
A complete technical comparison of JPEG XL and X Pixmap — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
JXL wins on browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | JXL | XPM |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | Yes | Yes |
| Animation Support | Yes | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | Yes | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | Yes | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | Yes | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | Yes | ✕ No |
JPEG XL
image/jxl
Extension
.jxl
Container
ISOBMFF / JPEG XL Codestream
Compression
Lossy (VarDCT) / Lossless (Modular)
Algorithm
VarDCT (Variable block-size DCT)Modular (Predictive coding for lossless)
Color Depth
8-bit, 10-bit, 12-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit (Float)
Developed by
Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG)
Released
2021
Magic Bytes
FF 0A (Codestream) / 00 00 00 0C 4A 58 4C 20 0D 0A 87 0A (Container)
X Pixmap
image/x-xpixmap
Extension
.xpm
Container
C Source Code Header (.c / .h)
Compression
Uncompressed (Source Code)
Algorithm
None
Color Depth
Indexed Color (Custom Palette with RGB and Alpha 'None')
Developed by
Daniel Dardailler and Colas Nahaboo (Bull / X Consortium)
Released
1989
Magic Bytes
2F 2A 20 58 50 4D 20 2A 2F (ASCII '/* XPM */')
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | JXL | XPM |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✓ 17+
|
✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ |
✓
|
JXL
JXL Strengths
- Capable of losslessly recompressing legacy JPEG files, saving ~20% space while retaining perfect byte-for-byte restorability
- Highly superior progressive decoding (Saliency-driven), allowing recognizable images to load extremely fast on slow connections
- Outperforms WebP and competes favorably with AVIF, especially at high-fidelity settings and for complex textures/photography
- Royalty-free with an open-source reference implementation (libjxl)
Limitations
- Google's removal of JXL support from Chrome severely hindered its adoption as a universal web standard
- Lack of hardware decoding chips compared to video-derived codecs like AVIF (AV1)
- File parsing logic is complex due to the split between raw codestreams and ISOBMFF containers
XPM
XPM Strengths
- Can be compiled directly into C or C++ source code without requiring an external asset loading mechanism
- Human-readable palette mapping allows developers to inspect, modify, or hand-craft icons directly within a text editor
- Native support for color palettes and transparency via the 'None' keyword
Limitations
- Extremely inefficient storage structure for large images, resulting in massive file bloat compared to binary formats like PNG
- Completely obsolete and unsupported in modern web browsers
- Parsing overhead requires compiling or interpreting text-based color tables at runtime
When to choose which format
JXL
Use JXL when…
- High-End Web Delivery (via Safari/Polyfills)
- HDR Photography
- Legacy JPEG Archiving
- Digital Art & Image Storage
XPM
Use XPM when…
- X Window System (X11) Application Icons and Cursors
- Embedded C/C++ Firmware Color UI Assets
- Early Linux Desktop Environment Themes