Image MIME Reference
JXL
JPEG XL
image/jxl
VS
PWG Raster Format
image/pwg-raster
PWG-Raster
A complete technical comparison of JPEG XL and PWG Raster Format — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
JXL wins on browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | JXL | PWG-Raster |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | Yes | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | Yes | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | Yes | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | Yes | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | Yes | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | Yes | ✕ No |
JPEG XL
image/jxl
Extension
.jxl
Container
ISOBMFF / JPEG XL Codestream
Compression
Lossy (VarDCT) / Lossless (Modular)
Algorithm
VarDCT (Variable block-size DCT)Modular (Predictive coding for lossless)
Color Depth
8-bit, 10-bit, 12-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit (Float)
Developed by
Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG)
Released
2021
Magic Bytes
FF 0A (Codestream) / 00 00 00 0C 4A 58 4C 20 0D 0A 87 0A (Container)
PWG Raster Format
image/pwg-raster
Extension
.pwg.ras
Container
CUPS Raster v2 Container
Compression
PackBits (Run-Length Encoding)
Algorithm
PackBits (Apple RLE variant)
Color Depth
1-bit (Monochrome/K), 8-bit (Grayscale), 24-bit (sRGB / Adobe RGB), 32-bit (CMYK)
Developed by
IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group (PWG)
Released
2011
Magic Bytes
52 61 53 32
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | JXL | PWG-Raster |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✓ 17+
|
✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
JXL
JXL Strengths
- Capable of losslessly recompressing legacy JPEG files, saving ~20% space while retaining perfect byte-for-byte restorability
- Highly superior progressive decoding (Saliency-driven), allowing recognizable images to load extremely fast on slow connections
- Outperforms WebP and competes favorably with AVIF, especially at high-fidelity settings and for complex textures/photography
- Royalty-free with an open-source reference implementation (libjxl)
Limitations
- Google's removal of JXL support from Chrome severely hindered its adoption as a universal web standard
- Lack of hardware decoding chips compared to video-derived codecs like AVIF (AV1)
- File parsing logic is complex due to the split between raw codestreams and ISOBMFF containers
PWG-Raster
PWG-Raster Strengths
- The undisputed global standard for modern, driverless printing environments, eliminating the nightmare of installing manufacturer-specific print drivers
- Extremely lightweight to decode on embedded hardware, requiring minimal RAM buffers on the printer side
- Strict color space and resolution rules guarantee that the printed output will successfully process without syntax errors
Limitations
- Generates massive file sizes and network payloads compared to vector-based formats like PDF or PostScript, as every page is fully rasterized at 300+ DPI before transmission
- No support for native rendering in web browsers, image viewers, or graphic design software without specialized CUPS developer tools
- Cannot store complex metadata, vector text, or layers
When to choose which format
JXL
Use JXL when…
- High-End Web Delivery (via Safari/Polyfills)
- HDR Photography
- Legacy JPEG Archiving
- Digital Art & Image Storage
PWG-Raster
Use PWG-Raster when…
- Driverless Network Printing (IPP Everywhere)
- Apple AirPrint and Mopria Print Service Pipelines
- CUPS (Common UNIX Printing System) Spooling