Image MIME Reference
JXL
JPEG XL
image/jxl
VS
Apple PICT Image
image/x-pict
PICT
A complete technical comparison of JPEG XL and Apple PICT Image — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
JXL wins on browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | JXL | PICT |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | Yes | Yes |
| Animation Support | Yes | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | Yes | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | Yes | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | Yes | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | Yes | ✕ No |
JPEG XL
image/jxl
Extension
.jxl
Container
ISOBMFF / JPEG XL Codestream
Compression
Lossy (VarDCT) / Lossless (Modular)
Algorithm
VarDCT (Variable block-size DCT)Modular (Predictive coding for lossless)
Color Depth
8-bit, 10-bit, 12-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit (Float)
Developed by
Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG)
Released
2021
Magic Bytes
FF 0A (Codestream) / 00 00 00 0C 4A 58 4C 20 0D 0A 87 0A (Container)
Apple PICT Image
image/x-pict
Extension
.pict.pct.pic
Container
QuickDraw Metafile
Compression
Uncompressed / Run-Length Encoding (RLE) / QuickTime Compressors (JPEG, SMC)
Algorithm
Apple PackBits (RLE)QuickTime Image Compression Manager (ICM)
Color Depth
1-bit, 2-bit, 4-bit, 8-bit (Indexed), 16-bit (High Color), 24-bit (True Color), 32-bit (RGBA)
Developed by
Apple Computer, Inc.
Released
1984
Magic Bytes
None (Requires offset parsing, e.g., 00 11 02 FF at byte 522)
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | JXL | PICT |
|---|---|---|
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
|
|
✓ 17+
|
✕ |
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
JXL
JXL Strengths
- Capable of losslessly recompressing legacy JPEG files, saving ~20% space while retaining perfect byte-for-byte restorability
- Highly superior progressive decoding (Saliency-driven), allowing recognizable images to load extremely fast on slow connections
- Outperforms WebP and competes favorably with AVIF, especially at high-fidelity settings and for complex textures/photography
- Royalty-free with an open-source reference implementation (libjxl)
Limitations
- Google's removal of JXL support from Chrome severely hindered its adoption as a universal web standard
- Lack of hardware decoding chips compared to video-derived codecs like AVIF (AV1)
- File parsing logic is complex due to the split between raw codestreams and ISOBMFF containers
PICT
PICT Strengths
- Incredibly versatile for its time, allowing a single file to cleanly scale text and vector shapes while simultaneously housing raster photos
- Served as the flawless universal clipboard format for the classic Mac OS, enabling seamless copy/pasting between wildly different applications
Limitations
- Deeply tied to Apple's legacy QuickDraw graphics architecture, making it exceptionally difficult to write accurate third-party parsers on modern operating systems
- Lack of a standard magic header makes file detection unreliable without seeking 522 bytes deep into the file
- Completely unsupported in modern web environments and discontinued by Apple itself
When to choose which format
JXL
Use JXL when…
- High-End Web Delivery (via Safari/Polyfills)
- HDR Photography
- Legacy JPEG Archiving
- Digital Art & Image Storage
PICT
Use PICT when…
- Classic Mac OS Clipboard Data
- Legacy Macintosh Desktop Publishing (Aldus PageMaker, QuarkXPress)
- 1980s/1990s Digital Clip Art