Free webp to jpg
Image MIME Reference
JXL

JPEG XL

image/jxl
VS

Minolta Raw Image

image/x-minolta-mrw
Minolta-MRW

A complete technical comparison of JPEG XL and Minolta Raw Image — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

JXL wins on browser support

Feature Support

Feature JXL Minolta-MRW
Transparency (Alpha) Yes ✕ No
Animation Support Yes ✕ No
Progressive Loading Yes ✕ No
HDR Support Yes Yes
EXIF Metadata Yes Yes
ICC Color Profile Yes Yes
JPEG XL
image/jxl
Extension
.jxl
Container ISOBMFF / JPEG XL Codestream
Compression Lossy (VarDCT) / Lossless (Modular)
Algorithm
VarDCT (Variable block-size DCT)Modular (Predictive coding for lossless)
Color Depth 8-bit, 10-bit, 12-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit (Float)
Developed by Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG)
Released 2021
Magic Bytes
FF 0A (Codestream) / 00 00 00 0C 4A 58 4C 20 0D 0A 87 0A (Container)
Full JXL reference →
Minolta Raw Image
image/x-minolta-mrw
Extension
.mrw
Container Proprietary MRW Container
Compression Uncompressed / Proprietary Lossless
Algorithm
NoneProprietary Lossless
Color Depth 12-bit (Per Channel)
Developed by Minolta (later Konica Minolta)
Released 2001
Magic Bytes
00 4D 52 4D
Full Minolta-MRW reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser JXL Minolta-MRW
Chrome Chrome
Firefox Firefox
Safari Safari
✓ 17+
Edge Edge
IE IE (Legacy)
JXL

JXL Strengths

  • Capable of losslessly recompressing legacy JPEG files, saving ~20% space while retaining perfect byte-for-byte restorability
  • Highly superior progressive decoding (Saliency-driven), allowing recognizable images to load extremely fast on slow connections
  • Outperforms WebP and competes favorably with AVIF, especially at high-fidelity settings and for complex textures/photography
  • Royalty-free with an open-source reference implementation (libjxl)
Limitations
  • Google's removal of JXL support from Chrome severely hindered its adoption as a universal web standard
  • Lack of hardware decoding chips compared to video-derived codecs like AVIF (AV1)
  • File parsing logic is complex due to the split between raw codestreams and ISOBMFF containers
Minolta-MRW

Minolta-MRW Strengths

  • Retains full, unadulterated sensor data from early CCD digital cameras, allowing modern demosaicing algorithms to extract far superior image quality than what was possible when the cameras were released
  • Possesses a very distinct, unambiguous magic header (\x00MRM), making programmatic identification completely foolproof
Limitations
  • Completely obsolete proprietary format that has not seen a new camera release since 2006
  • Cannot be natively viewed in web browsers or standard operating system image viewers without specialized decoders
  • Relies entirely on open-source reverse engineering (like LibRaw) for continued modern software compatibility

When to choose which format

JXL
Use JXL when…
  • High-End Web Delivery (via Safari/Polyfills)
  • HDR Photography
  • Legacy JPEG Archiving
  • Digital Art & Image Storage
Minolta-MRW
Use Minolta-MRW when…
  • Vintage Digital Photography (Konica Minolta DiMAGE / Maxxum)
  • Raw Imaging Archival
  • Historical Camera Sensor Research
Share this comparison