Image MIME Reference
JXL
JPEG XL
image/jxl
VS
Kodak K25 Raw Image
image/x-kodak-k25
Kodak-K25
A complete technical comparison of JPEG XL and Kodak K25 Raw Image — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
JXL wins on browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | JXL | Kodak-K25 |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | Yes | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | Yes | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | Yes | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | Yes | Yes |
| EXIF Metadata | Yes | Yes |
| ICC Color Profile | Yes | ✕ No |
JPEG XL
image/jxl
Extension
.jxl
Container
ISOBMFF / JPEG XL Codestream
Compression
Lossy (VarDCT) / Lossless (Modular)
Algorithm
VarDCT (Variable block-size DCT)Modular (Predictive coding for lossless)
Color Depth
8-bit, 10-bit, 12-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit (Float)
Developed by
Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG)
Released
2021
Magic Bytes
FF 0A (Codestream) / 00 00 00 0C 4A 58 4C 20 0D 0A 87 0A (Container)
Kodak K25 Raw Image
image/x-kodak-k25
Extension
.k25
Container
Proprietary Kodak Raw (TIFF-based variant)
Compression
Uncompressed / Proprietary Lossless
Algorithm
Proprietary Kodak Compression
Color Depth
10-bit, 12-bit (Per Channel)
Developed by
Eastman Kodak Company
Released
1996
Magic Bytes
Varies (Often resembles TIFF header 49 49 2A 00 or requires proprietary parsing)
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | JXL | Kodak-K25 |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✓ 17+
|
✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
JXL
JXL Strengths
- Capable of losslessly recompressing legacy JPEG files, saving ~20% space while retaining perfect byte-for-byte restorability
- Highly superior progressive decoding (Saliency-driven), allowing recognizable images to load extremely fast on slow connections
- Outperforms WebP and competes favorably with AVIF, especially at high-fidelity settings and for complex textures/photography
- Royalty-free with an open-source reference implementation (libjxl)
Limitations
- Google's removal of JXL support from Chrome severely hindered its adoption as a universal web standard
- Lack of hardware decoding chips compared to video-derived codecs like AVIF (AV1)
- File parsing logic is complex due to the split between raw codestreams and ISOBMFF containers
Kodak-K25
Kodak-K25 Strengths
- Historically significant format tied to the first digital camera to adopt CompactFlash memory
- Preserves original raw sensor data, allowing modern demosaicing algorithms (via LibRaw) to extract much better image quality than 1996-era software could
Limitations
- Completely obsolete and deeply proprietary, lacking modern raw format features found in DNG
- Cannot be natively viewed in web browsers or standard operating system image viewers without specialized decoders
- Subject to misidentification by automated MIME detection libraries due to structural similarities with standard TIFFs
When to choose which format
JXL
Use JXL when…
- High-End Web Delivery (via Safari/Polyfills)
- HDR Photography
- Legacy JPEG Archiving
- Digital Art & Image Storage
Kodak-K25
Use Kodak-K25 when…
- Vintage Digital Photography Archival
- Kodak DC25 Camera Restorations
- Historical Imaging Research