Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
JPX

JPEG 2000 Part 2 (Extended)

image/jpx
VS

X Bitmap (Legacy MIME Alias)

image/x-xbm
XBM

A complete technical comparison of JPEG 2000 Part 2 (Extended) and X Bitmap (Legacy MIME Alias) — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature JPX XBM
Transparency (Alpha) Yes Yes
Animation Support Yes ✕ No
Progressive Loading Yes ✕ No
HDR Support Yes ✕ No
EXIF Metadata Yes ✕ No
ICC Color Profile Yes ✕ No
JPEG 2000 Part 2 (Extended)
image/jpx
Extension
.jpx.jpf
Container ISOBMFF / JPX (ISO/IEC 15444-2)
Compression Lossy / Lossless
Algorithm
Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT)
Color Depth 8-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit, 38-bit
Developed by Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG)
Released 2002
Magic Bytes
00 00 00 0C 6A 50 20 20 0D 0A 87 0A ... 66 74 79 70 6A 70 78 20
Full JPX reference →
X Bitmap (Legacy MIME Alias)
image/x-xbm
Extension
.xbm
Container C Source Code Header (.h)
Compression Uncompressed (Source Code)
Algorithm
None
Color Depth 1-bit (Monochrome)
Developed by MIT / X Consortium (X Window System)
Released 1988
Magic Bytes
23 64 65 66 69 6e 65 (ASCII '#define')
Full XBM reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser JPX XBM
Chrome Chrome
✕ ✕
Firefox Firefox
✕ ✕
Safari Safari
✕ ✕
Edge Edge
✕ ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✕
✓
JPX

JPX Strengths

  • Removes the color space limitations of baseline JP2, adding native support for CMYK, CIE Lab, and custom vendor color spaces
  • Supports multiple codestreams in a single file, allowing for rich compositing and animation
  • Enables fragmented files where image data and metadata can reside in separate physical files via data references
Limitations
  • Extremely complex specification makes full software implementation rare, leading to compatibility issues
  • Zero web browser support, rendering it unsuitable for public internet distribution
  • Often overkill for standard imaging tasks where baseline JP2 or modern alternatives like AVIF suffice
XBM

XBM Strengths

  • Can be compiled directly into C or C++ source code without needing an external file loader or binary asset manager
  • Human-readable structure allows developers to inspect, edit, or hand-craft tiny icons directly within a text editor
  • Extremely predictable and lightweight for 1-bit hardware displays and embedded systems
Limitations
  • Strictly limited to 1-bit monochrome (black and white) graphics with no gray or color support
  • Text-based C syntax creates massive file bloat compared to binary 1-bit formats like PBM
  • Completely deprecated in modern web browsers and desktop GUI frameworks

When to choose which format

JPX
Use JPX when…
  • Prepress & Commercial Printing (CMYK)
  • Geospatial Data
  • Archival Preservation
  • Medical Imaging
XBM
Use XBM when…
  • X Window System (X11) Cursors and Icons
  • Embedded C/C++ Firmware UI Assets
  • Early 1990s Unix Web Graphics

More comparisons

JPX vs ACES → XBM vs ACES → JPX vs APNG → XBM vs APNG → JPX vs AVCI → XBM vs AVCI → JPX vs AVCS → XBM vs AVCS → JPX vs AVIF → XBM vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison