Free webp to jpg
Image MIME Reference
JPEG-XS-Sequence

JPEG XS Image Sequence (HEIF Container)

image/jxss
VS

Microsoft Document Imaging

image/vnd.ms-modi
MODI

A complete technical comparison of JPEG XS Image Sequence (HEIF Container) and Microsoft Document Imaging — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature JPEG-XS-Sequence MODI
Transparency (Alpha) Yes ✕ No
Animation Support Yes ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No ✕ No
HDR Support Yes ✕ No
EXIF Metadata Yes ✕ No
ICC Color Profile Yes ✕ No
JPEG XS Image Sequence (HEIF Container)
image/jxss
Extension
.jxss.jxs
Container HEIF / ISOBMFF (ISO/IEC 23008-12)
Compression Lossy (Visually Lossless) / Mathematically Lossless
Algorithm
JPEG XS (ISO/IEC 21122-1)
Color Depth 8-bit, 10-bit, 12-bit, 14-bit, 16-bit
Developed by Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG)
Released 2019
Magic Bytes
XX XX XX XX 66 74 79 70 6A 78 73 73
Full JPEG-XS-Sequence reference →
Microsoft Document Imaging
image/vnd.ms-modi
Extension
.mdi
Container TIFF Variant
Compression LZW / Proprietary MS Compression
Algorithm
LZW (Modified)
Color Depth 1-bit (Monochrome), 8-bit (Grayscale), 24-bit (RGB)
Developed by Microsoft Corporation
Released 2001
Magic Bytes
49 49 2A 00
Full MODI reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser JPEG-XS-Sequence MODI
Chrome Chrome
Firefox Firefox
Safari Safari
Edge Edge
IE IE (Legacy)
JPEG-XS-Sequence

JPEG-XS-Sequence Strengths

  • Provides sub-millisecond encoding and decoding latency across a video sequence while retaining visually lossless quality
  • Leverages the robust ISOBMFF track structures for accurate frame timing, audio synchronization, and metadata handling
  • Optimized for professional video production and IP broadcasting workflows
Limitations
  • Zero web browser compatibility, limiting its use entirely to professional and industrial hardware workflows
  • Compression ratios are significantly lower than consumer video codecs like HEVC or AV1
  • Extremely niche format that requires highly specialized broadcast hardware or custom software libraries to process
MODI

MODI Strengths

  • Historically provided an excellent all-in-one scanned document format with built-in OCR and annotations before PDF editing became universally accessible
  • Tightly integrated with Microsoft Office and SharePoint workflows in the early 2000s
Limitations
  • Completely proprietary and obsolete; Microsoft abandoned it in favor of standard TIFF and PDF
  • Causes widespread identification conflicts since its file signature is identical to a standard TIFF
  • Extremely difficult to open on modern operating systems without relying on third-party conversion utilities

When to choose which format

JPEG-XS-Sequence
Use JPEG-XS-Sequence when…
  • Live Broadcast Video Snippets
  • Medical Imaging Sequences
  • HDR Burst Photography Archiving
  • Automotive & Drone Video Storage
MODI
Use MODI when…
  • Legacy Scanned Document Archival
  • Microsoft Office XP/2003/2007 Workflows
  • Embedded OCR Text Storage
Share this comparison