Image MIME Reference
JPEG-XS-Sequence
JPEG XS Image Sequence (HEIF Container)
image/jxss
VS
Microsoft Document Imaging
image/vnd.ms-modi
MODI
A complete technical comparison of JPEG XS Image Sequence (HEIF Container) and Microsoft Document Imaging — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | JPEG-XS-Sequence | MODI |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | Yes | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | Yes | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | Yes | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | Yes | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | Yes | ✕ No |
JPEG XS Image Sequence (HEIF Container)
image/jxss
Extension
.jxss.jxs
Container
HEIF / ISOBMFF (ISO/IEC 23008-12)
Compression
Lossy (Visually Lossless) / Mathematically Lossless
Algorithm
JPEG XS (ISO/IEC 21122-1)
Color Depth
8-bit, 10-bit, 12-bit, 14-bit, 16-bit
Developed by
Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG)
Released
2019
Magic Bytes
XX XX XX XX 66 74 79 70 6A 78 73 73
Microsoft Document Imaging
image/vnd.ms-modi
Extension
.mdi
Container
TIFF Variant
Compression
LZW / Proprietary MS Compression
Algorithm
LZW (Modified)
Color Depth
1-bit (Monochrome), 8-bit (Grayscale), 24-bit (RGB)
Developed by
Microsoft Corporation
Released
2001
Magic Bytes
49 49 2A 00
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | JPEG-XS-Sequence | MODI |
|---|---|---|
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
JPEG-XS-Sequence
JPEG-XS-Sequence Strengths
- Provides sub-millisecond encoding and decoding latency across a video sequence while retaining visually lossless quality
- Leverages the robust ISOBMFF track structures for accurate frame timing, audio synchronization, and metadata handling
- Optimized for professional video production and IP broadcasting workflows
Limitations
- Zero web browser compatibility, limiting its use entirely to professional and industrial hardware workflows
- Compression ratios are significantly lower than consumer video codecs like HEVC or AV1
- Extremely niche format that requires highly specialized broadcast hardware or custom software libraries to process
MODI
MODI Strengths
- Historically provided an excellent all-in-one scanned document format with built-in OCR and annotations before PDF editing became universally accessible
- Tightly integrated with Microsoft Office and SharePoint workflows in the early 2000s
Limitations
- Completely proprietary and obsolete; Microsoft abandoned it in favor of standard TIFF and PDF
- Causes widespread identification conflicts since its file signature is identical to a standard TIFF
- Extremely difficult to open on modern operating systems without relying on third-party conversion utilities
When to choose which format
JPEG-XS-Sequence
Use JPEG-XS-Sequence when…
- Live Broadcast Video Snippets
- Medical Imaging Sequences
- HDR Burst Photography Archiving
- Automotive & Drone Video Storage
MODI
Use MODI when…
- Legacy Scanned Document Archival
- Microsoft Office XP/2003/2007 Workflows
- Embedded OCR Text Storage