Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
JPEG-XS-(HEIF)

JPEG XS Image (HEIF Container)

image/jxsi
VS

X Pixmap

image/x-xpixmap
XPM

A complete technical comparison of JPEG XS Image (HEIF Container) and X Pixmap — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature JPEG-XS-(HEIF) XPM
Transparency (Alpha) Yes Yes
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No ✕ No
HDR Support Yes ✕ No
EXIF Metadata Yes ✕ No
ICC Color Profile Yes ✕ No
JPEG XS Image (HEIF Container)
image/jxsi
Extension
.jxsi.jxs.hif
Container HEIF / ISOBMFF (ISO/IEC 23008-12)
Compression Lossy (Visually Lossless) / Mathematically Lossless
Algorithm
JPEG XS (ISO/IEC 21122-1)
Color Depth 8-bit, 10-bit, 12-bit, 14-bit, 16-bit
Developed by Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG)
Released 2019
Magic Bytes
XX XX XX XX 66 74 79 70 6A 78 73 69
Full JPEG-XS-(HEIF) reference →
X Pixmap
image/x-xpixmap
Extension
.xpm
Container C Source Code Header (.c / .h)
Compression Uncompressed (Source Code)
Algorithm
None
Color Depth Indexed Color (Custom Palette with RGB and Alpha 'None')
Developed by Daniel Dardailler and Colas Nahaboo (Bull / X Consortium)
Released 1989
Magic Bytes
2F 2A 20 58 50 4D 20 2A 2F (ASCII '/* XPM */')
Full XPM reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser JPEG-XS-(HEIF) XPM
Chrome Chrome
✕ ✕
Firefox Firefox
✕ ✕
Safari Safari
✕ ✕
Edge Edge
✕ ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✕
✓
JPEG-XS-(HEIF)

JPEG-XS-(HEIF) Strengths

  • Provides sub-millisecond encoding and decoding latency while retaining visually lossless quality
  • Brings the extensive metadata, EXIF, XMP, and color-profiling capabilities of the HEIF container to JPEG XS
  • Allows grouping of multiple high-quality JPEG XS frames into a single collection file
Limitations
  • Zero web browser compatibility, limiting it entirely to professional and industrial hardware workflows
  • Extremely niche adoption compared to standard HEVC-based HEIC or raw JPEG XS codestreams
  • Requires custom parsing logic to extract the JPEG XS codestream from the HEIF boxes
XPM

XPM Strengths

  • Can be compiled directly into C or C++ source code without requiring an external asset loading mechanism
  • Human-readable palette mapping allows developers to inspect, modify, or hand-craft icons directly within a text editor
  • Native support for color palettes and transparency via the 'None' keyword
Limitations
  • Extremely inefficient storage structure for large images, resulting in massive file bloat compared to binary formats like PNG
  • Completely obsolete and unsupported in modern web browsers
  • Parsing overhead requires compiling or interpreting text-based color tables at runtime

When to choose which format

JPEG-XS-(HEIF)
Use JPEG-XS-(HEIF) when…
  • Live Broadcast Infrastructure
  • Medical Imaging & Archival
  • Video over IP Networks
  • Automotive & Drone Systems
XPM
Use XPM when…
  • X Window System (X11) Application Icons and Cursors
  • Embedded C/C++ Firmware Color UI Assets
  • Early Linux Desktop Environment Themes

More comparisons

JPEG-XS-(HEIF) vs ACES → XPM vs ACES → JPEG-XS-(HEIF) vs APNG → XPM vs APNG → JPEG-XS-(HEIF) vs AVCI → XPM vs AVCI → JPEG-XS-(HEIF) vs AVCS → XPM vs AVCS → JPEG-XS-(HEIF) vs AVIF → XPM vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison