Free webp to jpg
Image MIME Reference
JPEG-LS

JPEG-LS

image/jls
VS

X Window Dump (Legacy MIME Alias)

image/x-xwindowdump
XWD

A complete technical comparison of JPEG-LS and X Window Dump (Legacy MIME Alias) — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature JPEG-LS XWD
Transparency (Alpha) ✕ No Yes
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No ✕ No
HDR Support Yes ✕ No
EXIF Metadata ✕ No ✕ No
ICC Color Profile ✕ No ✕ No
JPEG-LS
image/jls
Extension
.jls.jl
Container JPEG Bitstream
Compression Lossless / Near-Lossless (Predictive Coding)
Algorithm
LOCO-I (Low Complexity Lossless Compression for Images)Golomb-Rice Coding
Color Depth 8-bit, 12-bit, 16-bit (Per Channel)
Developed by Joint Photographic Experts Group (ISO/ITU-T) & HP Labs
Released 1999
Magic Bytes
FF D8 FF F7
Full JPEG-LS reference →
X Window Dump (Legacy MIME Alias)
image/x-xwindowdump
Extension
.xwd.wd
Container XWDHeader / XWDFileHeader Structure
Compression Uncompressed
Algorithm
None
Color Depth 8-bit (Indexed), 16-bit (High Color), 24-bit (True Color), 32-bit (True Color with Alpha/Padding)
Developed by MIT / X Consortium (X Window System)
Released 1987
Magic Bytes
00 00 00 64 (Typically indicates a 100-byte header size followed by version)
Full XWD reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser JPEG-LS XWD
Chrome Chrome
Firefox Firefox
Safari Safari
Edge Edge
IE IE (Legacy)
JPEG-LS

JPEG-LS Strengths

  • Provides state-of-the-art lossless compression ratios for continuous-tone images, often outperforming Lossless JPEG and JPEG 2000
  • Extremely fast and computationally inexpensive to encode/decode, requiring no complex floating-point math or DCTs
  • Highly resilient in constrained hardware environments, making it ideal for medical equipment and deep-space probes (e.g., Mars rovers)
Limitations
  • Zero native support in web browsers or standard consumer operating systems
  • Lacks the advanced resolution scalability and progressive decoding features found in JPEG 2000
  • Primarily relegated to niche enterprise sectors (healthcare/DICOM and aerospace) rather than consumer adoption
XWD

XWD Strengths

  • Provides an exact, raw pixel dump directly from the X11 display server memory without compression overhead
  • Extremely fast for Unix environments to generate during low-level graphical debugging
Limitations
  • Completely uncompressed, resulting in large, bloated file sizes
  • Zero support in web browsers or modern desktop environments without specialized graphics translation tools
  • Verbose legacy MIME strings like 'image/x-xwindowdump' require backend normalization in modern applications

When to choose which format

JPEG-LS
Use JPEG-LS when…
  • Medical Imaging (DICOM Encapsulation)
  • Space and Planetary Imaging (NASA/ESA)
  • Industrial Machine Vision
  • Scientific Archival Storage
XWD
Use XWD when…
  • X Window System (X11) Display Debugging and Screenshots
  • Legacy Unix/Linux System Administration
Share this comparison