Image MIME Reference
JPEG-LS
JPEG-LS
image/jls
VS
Progressive JPEG (Legacy IE Alias)
image/pjpeg
PJPEG
A complete technical comparison of JPEG-LS and Progressive JPEG (Legacy IE Alias) — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
PJPEG wins on browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | JPEG-LS | PJPEG |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | Yes |
| HDR Support | Yes | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | Yes |
| ICC Color Profile | ✕ No | Yes |
JPEG-LS
image/jls
Extension
.jls.jl
Container
JPEG Bitstream
Compression
Lossless / Near-Lossless (Predictive Coding)
Algorithm
LOCO-I (Low Complexity Lossless Compression for Images)Golomb-Rice Coding
Color Depth
8-bit, 12-bit, 16-bit (Per Channel)
Developed by
Joint Photographic Experts Group (ISO/ITU-T) & HP Labs
Released
1999
Magic Bytes
FF D8 FF F7
Progressive JPEG (Legacy IE Alias)
image/pjpeg
Extension
.jpeg.jpg.pjpeg.pjp.jfif
Container
JPEG (ISO/IEC 10918-1)
Compression
Lossy (DCT)
Algorithm
Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT)
Color Depth
8-bit, 12-bit
Developed by
Joint Photographic Experts Group / Microsoft (Alias)
Released
1992
Magic Bytes
FF D8 FF E0 (JFIF) / FF D8 FF E1 (Exif)
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | JPEG-LS | PJPEG |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ |
✓ All
|
Firefox
|
✕ |
✓ All
|
Safari
|
✕ |
✓ All
|
Edge
|
✕ |
✓ All
|
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ |
✓
|
JPEG-LS
JPEG-LS Strengths
- Provides state-of-the-art lossless compression ratios for continuous-tone images, often outperforming Lossless JPEG and JPEG 2000
- Extremely fast and computationally inexpensive to encode/decode, requiring no complex floating-point math or DCTs
- Highly resilient in constrained hardware environments, making it ideal for medical equipment and deep-space probes (e.g., Mars rovers)
Limitations
- Zero native support in web browsers or standard consumer operating systems
- Lacks the advanced resolution scalability and progressive decoding features found in JPEG 2000
- Primarily relegated to niche enterprise sectors (healthcare/DICOM and aerospace) rather than consumer adoption
PJPEG
PJPEG Strengths
- Progressive JPEGs (which this MIME type attempted to describe) provide excellent perceived loading speeds on slow connections by rendering a low-resolution preview first
- Files sent with this MIME type are fully backwards compatible with any standard JPEG decoder
Limitations
- It is a non-standard MIME type that violates IANA specifications
- Causes strict file upload validation scripts to fail if not explicitly whitelisted or mapped
- Creates unnecessary confusion, as the official image/jpeg MIME type already fully encompasses progressive encoding
When to choose which format
JPEG-LS
Use JPEG-LS when…
- Medical Imaging (DICOM Encapsulation)
- Space and Planetary Imaging (NASA/ESA)
- Industrial Machine Vision
- Scientific Archival Storage
PJPEG
Use PJPEG when…
- Legacy Internet Explorer File Uploads
- Progressive Image Rendering (Historical context)