Image MIME Reference
JPEG-LS
JPEG-LS
image/jls
VS
PiCture eXchange
image/x-pcx
PCX
A complete technical comparison of JPEG-LS and PiCture eXchange — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | JPEG-LS | PCX |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | Yes | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | ✕ No | ✕ No |
JPEG-LS
image/jls
Extension
.jls.jl
Container
JPEG Bitstream
Compression
Lossless / Near-Lossless (Predictive Coding)
Algorithm
LOCO-I (Low Complexity Lossless Compression for Images)Golomb-Rice Coding
Color Depth
8-bit, 12-bit, 16-bit (Per Channel)
Developed by
Joint Photographic Experts Group (ISO/ITU-T) & HP Labs
Released
1999
Magic Bytes
FF D8 FF F7
PiCture eXchange
image/x-pcx
Extension
.pcx
Container
ZSoft Proprietary Header (128 bytes)
Compression
Run-Length Encoding (RLE)
Algorithm
ZSoft RLE
Color Depth
1-bit (Monochrome), 4-bit (16 colors), 8-bit (256 colors), 24-bit (True Color)
Developed by
ZSoft Corporation
Released
1985
Magic Bytes
0A (followed by version, e.g., 0A 05 01 08)
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | JPEG-LS | PCX |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
JPEG-LS
JPEG-LS Strengths
- Provides state-of-the-art lossless compression ratios for continuous-tone images, often outperforming Lossless JPEG and JPEG 2000
- Extremely fast and computationally inexpensive to encode/decode, requiring no complex floating-point math or DCTs
- Highly resilient in constrained hardware environments, making it ideal for medical equipment and deep-space probes (e.g., Mars rovers)
Limitations
- Zero native support in web browsers or standard consumer operating systems
- Lacks the advanced resolution scalability and progressive decoding features found in JPEG 2000
- Primarily relegated to niche enterprise sectors (healthcare/DICOM and aerospace) rather than consumer adoption
PCX
PCX Strengths
- Incredibly simple RLE algorithm makes it very fast to decode, which was historically vital for early 3D video game engines
- Retains crisp, lossless pixel data suitable for pixel art and interface assets
- Well-documented and highly supported by older desktop publishing and image editing software
Limitations
- Extremely inefficient compression by modern standards, producing large file sizes compared to PNG
- Lacks modern imaging features such as alpha channel transparency, EXIF metadata, and color profiles
- Zero support in web browsers; must be converted to PNG for web use
When to choose which format
JPEG-LS
Use JPEG-LS when…
- Medical Imaging (DICOM Encapsulation)
- Space and Planetary Imaging (NASA/ESA)
- Industrial Machine Vision
- Scientific Archival Storage
PCX
Use PCX when…
- MS-DOS and Early Windows Graphics
- 1990s Video Game Assets (Textures, UI)
- Retro Computing Archival