Image MIME Reference
JPEG-2000
JPEG 2000 Core Image File
image/jp2
VS
Sony SR2 Raw Image
image/x-sony-sr2
Sony-SR2
A complete technical comparison of JPEG 2000 Core Image File and Sony SR2 Raw Image — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
JPEG-2000 wins on browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | JPEG-2000 | Sony-SR2 |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | Yes | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | Yes | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | Yes | Yes |
| EXIF Metadata | Yes | Yes |
| ICC Color Profile | Yes | Yes |
JPEG 2000 Core Image File
image/jp2
Extension
.jp2.j2k.jpf.jpx.jpm
Container
JP2 (ISO/IEC 15444-1)
Compression
Lossy / Lossless
Algorithm
Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT)
Color Depth
8-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit, 38-bit
Developed by
Joint Photographic Experts Group
Released
2000
Magic Bytes
00 00 00 0C 6A 50 20 20 0D 0A 87 0A
Sony SR2 Raw Image
image/x-sony-sr2
Extension
.sr2
Container
TIFF-based (Proprietary)
Compression
Uncompressed / Sony Proprietary Lossless
Algorithm
NoneSony Proprietary Lossless
Color Depth
12-bit (Per Channel)
Developed by
Sony Corporation
Released
2005
Magic Bytes
49 49 2A 00
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | JPEG-2000 | Sony-SR2 |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✓ 5+
|
✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
JPEG-2000
JPEG-2000 Strengths
- Superior compression efficiency over baseline JPEG without introducing blocking artifacts
- True mathematically lossless compression available in the same format
- Extremely scalable: a single file can be decoded at various resolutions (thumbnails to full size) without loading the entire file
Limitations
- Very poor native web browser support prevents it from being a web standard
- High computational complexity makes encoding and decoding significantly slower than JPEG
- Early patent concerns and complex licensing hindered its initial adoption rate
Sony-SR2
Sony-SR2 Strengths
- Retains raw, unprocessed sensor data from legacy cameras, allowing modern raw processors to extract vastly superior image quality than what was possible in 2005
- Utilizes a standard TIFF container structure, ensuring that community-maintained open-source decoding libraries (like LibRaw) can easily parse and maintain support for it indefinitely
Limitations
- Completely obsolete format that has not been utilized in a new camera release in over a decade
- MIME detection via magic bytes is unreliable due to TIFF header spoofing, requiring deeper EXIF inspection
- Cannot be natively viewed in web browsers or standard operating system image viewers without specialized decoders
When to choose which format
JPEG-2000
Use JPEG-2000 when…
- Digital Cinema (DCP)
- Medical Imaging (DICOM)
- Geospatial Data
- Archival Preservation
Sony-SR2
Use Sony-SR2 when…
- Legacy Sony Cyber-shot/Alpha Photography
- Non-destructive Image Post-Processing
- Raw Imaging Archival