Image MIME Reference
JPEG-2000
JPEG 2000 Core Image File
image/jp2
VS
North American Presentation Level Protocol Syntax
image/naplps
NAPLPS
A complete technical comparison of JPEG 2000 Core Image File and North American Presentation Level Protocol Syntax — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
JPEG-2000 wins on browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | JPEG-2000 | NAPLPS |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | Yes | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | Yes |
| Progressive Loading | Yes | Yes |
| HDR Support | Yes | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | Yes | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | Yes | ✕ No |
JPEG 2000 Core Image File
image/jp2
Extension
.jp2.j2k.jpf.jpx.jpm
Container
JP2 (ISO/IEC 15444-1)
Compression
Lossy / Lossless
Algorithm
Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT)
Color Depth
8-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit, 38-bit
Developed by
Joint Photographic Experts Group
Released
2000
Magic Bytes
00 00 00 0C 6A 50 20 20 0D 0A 87 0A
North American Presentation Level Protocol Syntax
image/naplps
Extension
.nap.naplps
Container
NAPLPS Byte Stream
Compression
Uncompressed (Tokenized ASCII Commands)
Algorithm
None (Coordinate encoding)
Color Depth
16-color palette (Indexed from larger color spaces)
Developed by
ANSI / CSA (Based on Canadian CRC's Telidon)
Released
1983
Magic Bytes
1B (Variable / ESC sequences)
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | JPEG-2000 | NAPLPS |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✓ 5+
|
✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
JPEG-2000
JPEG-2000 Strengths
- Superior compression efficiency over baseline JPEG without introducing blocking artifacts
- True mathematically lossless compression available in the same format
- Extremely scalable: a single file can be decoded at various resolutions (thumbnails to full size) without loading the entire file
Limitations
- Very poor native web browser support prevents it from being a web standard
- High computational complexity makes encoding and decoding significantly slower than JPEG
- Early patent concerns and complex licensing hindered its initial adoption rate
NAPLPS
NAPLPS Strengths
- Extremely bandwidth-efficient, enabling colorful graphical interfaces over early 300 baud dial-up connections
- Resolution-independent vector scaling allowed the exact same file to be displayed accurately on varied early PC monitors and television sets
Limitations
- Completely obsolete and unsupported by modern web technologies
- Relies heavily on stateful parsing and terminal emulators rather than straightforward file decoding
- Easily misidentified by MIME sniffers as plain text or generic binary streams due to the lack of a standardized file header
When to choose which format
JPEG-2000
Use JPEG-2000 when…
- Digital Cinema (DCP)
- Medical Imaging (DICOM)
- Geospatial Data
- Archival Preservation
NAPLPS
Use NAPLPS when…
- 1980s Videotex Services
- Prodigy Online Service Graphics
- Historical BBS Terminal Graphics
- Legacy Teletext Broadcasts